mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pragmatic Feature Preferences: Learning Reward-Relevant Preferences from Human Input

arXiv 2405.14769 ↗First posted 23 May 2024cs.LG cs.CLcited by 8

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans use social context to specify preferences over behaviors, i.e. their reward functions. Yet, algorithms for inferring reward models from preference data do not take this social learning view into account. Inspired by pragmatic human communication, we study how to extract fine-grained data regarding why an example is preferred that is useful for learning more accurate reward models. We propose to enrich binary preference queries to ask both (1) which features of a given example are preferable in addition to (2) comparisons between examples themselves. We derive an approach for learning from these feature-level preferences, both for cases where users specify which features are reward-relevant, and when users do not. We evaluate our approach on linear bandit settings in both vision- and language-based domains. Results support the efficiency of our approach in quickly converging to accurate rewards with fewer comparisons vs. example-only labels. Finally, we validate the real-world applicability with a behavioral experiment on a mushroom foraging task. Our findings suggest that incorporating pragmatic feature preferences is a promising approach for more efficient user-aligned reward learning.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2024.

Builds on

19 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback22 Dec
  2. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback27 Jul
  3. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training2 Jun
  4. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 14

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  3. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  4. 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 246
  5. 2023Eliciting Human Preferences with Language Modelscited by 90
  6. 2019InfoBot: Transfer and Exploration via the Information Bottleneckcited by 78
  7. 2022Inferring Rewards from Language in Contextcited by 50
  8. 2021People construct simplified mental representations to plancited by 45
  9. 2017Pragmatic-Pedagogic Value Alignmentcited by 36
  10. 2016Learning Preferences for Manipulation Tasks from Online Coactive Feedbackcited by 31
  11. 2022How to talk so AI will learn: Instructions, descriptions, and autonomycited by 22
  12. 2018Learning from Richer Human Guidance: Augmenting Comparison-Based Learning with Feature Queriescited by 16
2 more
  1. 2023Diagnosis, Feedback, Adaptation: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Test-Time Policy Adaptationcited by 16
  2. 2024Learning with Language-Guided State Abstractionscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Features
  2. 2025Rectifying Shortcut Behaviors in Preference-based Reward Learning
  3. 2026Beyond Binary Preferences: A Principled Framework for Reward Modeling with Ordinal Feedback
  4. 2026Preference learning in shades of gray: Interpretable and bias-aware reward modeling for human preferences
  5. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling
  6. 2024Improving Context-Aware Preference Modeling for Language Models
  7. 2026Personalized RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models with Human Aligned Personalization
  8. 2026Using Context Is Not Enough: Test-Time Training for Personalized Reward Modeling