mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining Reward Functions to Humans for Better Human-Robot Collaboration

arXiv 2110.04192 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2021cs.RO cs.AI cs.HCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable AI techniques that describe agent reward functions can enhance human-robot collaboration in a variety of settings. One context where human understanding of agent reward functions is particularly beneficial is in the value alignment setting. In the value alignment context, an agent aims to infer a human's reward function through interaction so that it can assist the human with their tasks. If the human can understand where gaps exist in the agent's reward understanding, they will be able to teach more efficiently and effectively, leading to quicker human-agent team performance improvements. In order to support human collaborators in the value alignment setting and similar contexts, it is first important to understand the effectiveness of different reward explanation techniques in a variety of domains. In this paper, we introduce a categorization of information modalities for reward explanation techniques, suggest a suite of assessment techniques for human reward understanding, and introduce four axes of domain complexity. We then propose an experiment to study the relative efficacy of a broad set of reward explanation techniques covering multiple modalities of information in a set of domains of varying complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2021.

Builds on

13 of 28 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  2. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  3. 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 298
  4. 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 257
  5. 2015The Bayesian Case Model: A Generative Approach for Case-Based Reasoning and Prototype Classificationcited by 76
  6. 2019An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
  7. 2019Asking Easy Questions: A User-Friendly Approach to Active Reward Learningcited by 67
  8. 2018Establishing Appropriate Trust via Critical Statescited by 47
  9. 2017Pragmatic-Pedagogic Value Alignmentcited by 36
  10. 2017Enabling Robots to Communicate their Objectivescited by 34
  11. 2019Exploring Computational User Models for Agent Policy Summarizationcited by 29
  12. 2019Explaining Reinforcement Learning to Mere Mortals: An Empirical Studycited by 21
1 more
  1. 2020Interactive Robot Training for Non-Markov Taskscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

3 papers.