mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scalable Co-Optimization of Morphology and Control in Embodied Machines

arXiv 1706.06133 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2017cs.AIcited by 38

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evolution sculpts both the body plans and nervous systems of agents together over time. In contrast, in AI and robotics, a robot's body plan is usually designed by hand, and control policies are then optimized for that fixed design. The task of simultaneously co-optimizing the morphology and controller of an embodied robot has remained a challenge. In psychology, the theory of embodied cognition posits that behavior arises from a close coupling between body plan and sensorimotor control, which suggests why co-optimizing these two subsystems is so difficult: most evolutionary changes to morphology tend to adversely impact sensorimotor control, leading to an overall decrease in behavioral performance. Here, we further examine this hypothesis and demonstrate a technique for "morphological innovation protection", which temporarily reduces selection pressure on recently morphologically-changed individuals, thus enabling evolution some time to "readapt" to the new morphology with subsequent control policy mutations. We show the potential for this method to avoid local optima and converge to similar highly fit morphologies across widely varying initial conditions, while sustaining fitness improvements further into optimization. While this technique is admittedly only the first of many steps that must be taken to achieve scalable optimization of embodied machines, we hope that theoretical insight into the cause of evolutionary stagnation in current methods will help to enable the automation of robot design and behavioral training -- while simultaneously providing a testbed to investigate the theory of embodied cognition.

Key facts. Cited by 38 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 4; 2023: 7; 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 8.

38 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Embodied Intelligence via Learning and Evolutioncited by 154
  2. 2022MetaMorph: Learning Universal Controllers with Transformerscited by 78
  3. 2021Transform2Act: Learning a Transform-and-Control Policy for Efficient Agent Designcited by 34
  4. 2021Task-Agnostic Morphology Evolutioncited by 22
  5. 2021Learning Modular Robot Control Policiescited by 18
  6. 2023Symmetry-Aware Robot Design with Structured Subgroupscited by 13
  7. 2021Beyond Robustness: A Taxonomy of Approaches towards Resilient Multi-Robot Systemscited by 12
  8. 2021The Effects of Learning in Morphologically Evolving Robot Systemscited by 10
  9. 2025VLMgineer: Vision Language Models as Robotic Toolsmithscited by 9
  10. 2023MORPH: Design Co-optimization with Reinforcement Learning via a Differentiable Hardware Model Proxycited by 8
  11. 2021Morpho-evolution with learning using a controller archive as an inheritance mechanismcited by 7
  12. 2023Reinforcement learning for freeform robot designcited by 7
26 more
  1. 2022Environment Optimization for Multi-Agent Navigationcited by 6
  2. 2023Constrained Environment Optimization for Prioritized Multi-Agent Navigationcited by 6
  3. 2023Curriculum Reinforcement Learning via Morphology-Environment Co-Evolutioncited by 5
  4. 2022Severe Damage Recovery in Evolving Soft Robots through Differentiable Programmingcited by 4
  5. 2023Leveraging Hyperbolic Embeddings for Coarse-to-Fine Robot Designcited by 4
  6. 2024Co-Optimizing Reconfigurable Environments and Policies for Decentralized Multi-Agent Navigationcited by 4
  7. 2025Embodied Co-Design for Rapidly Evolving Agents: Taxonomy, Frontiers, and Challengescited by 4
  8. 2022Biological Robots: Perspectives on an Emerging Interdisciplinary Fieldcited by 3
  9. 2024Evolution and learning in differentiable robotscited by 3
  10. 2025Controller Distillation Reduces Fragile Brain-Body Co-Adaptation and Enables Migrations in MAP-Elitescited by 3
  11. 2024Lamarckian Inheritance Improves Robot Evolution in Dynamic Environmentscited by 2
  12. 2024Towards Multi-Morphology Controllers with Diversity and Knowledge Distillationcited by 2
  13. 2026Efficient Morphology-Control Co-Design via Stackelberg Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 2
  14. 2023Lamarck's Revenge: Inheritance of Learned Traits Can Make Robot Evolution Bettercited by 1
  15. 2024No-brainer: Morphological Computation driven Adaptive Behavior in Soft Robotscited by 1
  16. 2024Fairness in Reinforcement Learning with Bisimulation Metricscited by 1
  17. 2025Scaling Multi-Agent Environment Co-Design with Diffusion Modelscited by 1
  18. 2026Social Learning Strategies for Evolved Virtual Soft Robotscited by 1
  19. 2024An Empirical Study on the Computation Budget of Co-Optimization of Robot Design and Control in Simulationcited by 0
  20. 2025Debate2Create: Robot Co-design via Multi-Agent LLM Debatecited by 0
  21. 2026Physical Imitation Learning: Distilling Control Policies into Passive Elasticitycited by 0
  22. 2026Lamarckian Inheritance in Dynamic Environments: How Key Variables Affect Evolutionary Dynamicscited by 0
  23. 2026When Search Becomes Memory: Accelerating Robot Design Discovery with Self-Evolving Skillscited by 0
  24. 2026Seven Sources of Physical AI Capability Formationcited by 0
  25. 2026Bridging Body and Brain: Gene-Driven Morphology--Control Co-Designcited by 0
  26. 2026Evolving Dexterous Robots from Scratchcited by 0