The Effects of Learning in Morphologically Evolving Robot Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Simultaneously evolving morphologies (bodies) and controllers (brains) of robots can cause a mismatch between the inherited body and brain in the offspring. To mitigate this problem, the addition of an infant learning period by the so-called Triangle of Life framework has been proposed relatively long ago. However, an empirical assessment is still lacking to-date. In this paper we investigate the effects of such a learning mechanism from different perspectives. Using extensive simulations we show that learning can greatly increase task performance and reduce the number of generations required to reach a certain fitness level compared to the purely evolutionary approach. Furthermore, although learning only directly affects the controllers, we demonstrate that the evolved morphologies will be also different. This provides a quantitative demonstration that changes in the brain can induce changes in the body. Finally, we examine the concept of morphological intelligence quantified by the ability of a given body to learn. We observe that the learning delta, the performance difference between the inherited and the learned brain, is growing throughout the evolutionary process. This shows that evolution is producing robots with an increasing plasticity, that is, consecutive generations are becoming better and better learners which in turn makes them better and better at the given task. All in all, our results demonstrate that the Triangle of Life is not only a concept of theoretical interest, but a system architecture with practical benefits.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2021.
Builds on
13 of 47 references.
References · 13
- 2021Embodied Intelligence via Learning and Evolutioncited by 163
- 2018Jointly Learning to Construct and Control Agents using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 55
- 2017Scalable Co-Optimization of Morphology and Control in Embodied Machinescited by 40
- 2019Data-efficient Co-Adaptation of Morphology and Behaviour with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
- 2019Neural Graph Evolution: Towards Efficient Automatic Robot Designcited by 36
- 2020Time Efficiency in Optimization with a Bayesian-Evolutionary Algorithmcited by 27
- 2019Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobotcited by 26
- 2020MAP-Elites enables Powerful Stepping Stones and Diversity for Modular Roboticscited by 11
- 2021Morpho-evolution with learning using a controller archive as an inheritance mechanismcited by 9
- 2020Differential Evolution with Reversible Linear Transformationscited by 8
- 2018Real-World Evolution Adapts Robot Morphology and Control to Hardware Limitationscited by 5
- 2020The Dynamic of Body and Brain Co-Evolutioncited by 2
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2025Embodied Co-Design for Rapidly Evolving Agents: Taxonomy, Frontiers, and Challengescited by 4
- 2023A comparison of controller architectures and learning mechanisms for arbitrary robot morphologiescited by 2
- 2024Lamarckian Inheritance Improves Robot Evolution in Dynamic Environmentscited by 2
- 2023Lamarck's Revenge: Inheritance of Learned Traits Can Make Robot Evolution Bettercited by 1
- 2024Efficient and Diverse Generative Robot Designs using Evolution and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 1
- 2026Social Learning Strategies for Evolved Virtual Soft Robotscited by 1
- 2023Exploring Robot Morphology Spaces through Breadth-First Search and Random Querycited by 0
- 2024An Empirical Study on the Computation Budget of Co-Optimization of Robot Design and Control in Simulationcited by 0
- 2024More complex environments may be required to discover benefits of lifetime learning in evolving robotscited by 0
- 2026Benefits of Low-Cost Bio-Inspiration in the Age of Overparametrizationcited by 0
- 2026Lamarckian Inheritance in Dynamic Environments: How Key Variables Affect Evolutionary Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026Lamarckian Inheritance in Dynamic Environments: How Key Variables Affect Evolutionary Dynamics15 May 2026
- 2026Benefits of Low-Cost Bio-Inspiration in the Age of Overparametrization22 Apr 2026
- 2026Social Learning Strategies for Evolved Virtual Soft Robots14 Apr 2026
- 2025Embodied Co-Design for Rapidly Evolving Agents: Taxonomy, Frontiers, and Challenges4 Dec 2025
- 2024More complex environments may be required to discover benefits of lifetime learning in evolving robots11 Dec 2024
- 2024Efficient and Diverse Generative Robot Designs using Evolution and Intrinsic Motivation27 Nov 2024
- 2024An Empirical Study on the Computation Budget of Co-Optimization of Robot Design and Control in Simulation13 Sep 2024
- 2024Lamarckian Inheritance Improves Robot Evolution in Dynamic Environments28 Mar 2024
- 2023Exploring Robot Morphology Spaces through Breadth-First Search and Random Query25 Sep 2023
- 2023A comparison of controller architectures and learning mechanisms for arbitrary robot morphologies25 Sep 2023
- 2023Lamarck's Revenge: Inheritance of Learned Traits Can Make Robot Evolution Better22 Sep 2023