Controller Distillation Reduces Fragile Brain-Body Co-Adaptation and Enables Migrations in MAP-Elites
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Brain-body co-optimization suffers from fragile co-adaptation where brains become over-specialized for particular bodies, hindering their ability to transfer well to others. Evolutionary algorithms tend to discard such low-performing solutions, eliminating promising morphologies. Previous work considered applying MAP-Elites, where niche descriptors are based on morphological features, to promote better search over morphology space. In this work, we show that this approach still suffers from fragile co-adaptation: where a core mechanism of MAP-Elites, creating stepping stones through solutions that migrate from one niche to another, is disrupted. We suggest that this disruption occurs because the body mutations that move an offspring to a new morphological niche break the robots' fragile brain-body co-adaptation and thus significantly decrease the performance of those potential solutions -- reducing their likelihood of outcompeting an existing elite in that new niche. We utilize a technique, we call Pollination, that periodically replaces the controllers of certain solutions with a distilled controller with better generalization across morphologies to reduce fragile brain-body co-adaptation and thus promote MAP-Elites migrations. Pollination increases the success of body mutations and the number of migrations, resulting in better quality-diversity metrics. We believe we develop important insights that could apply to other domains where MAP-Elites is used.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2025.
Builds on
19 of 34 references.
References · 19
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2015Policy Distillationcited by 440
- 2015Actor-Mimic: Deep Multitask and Transfer Reinforcement Learningcited by 178
- 2021Embodied Intelligence via Learning and Evolutioncited by 163
- 2020One Policy to Control Them All: Shared Modular Policies for Agent-Agnostic Controlcited by 121
- 2017Quality and Diversity Optimization: A Unifying Modular Frameworkcited by 113
- 2022MetaMorph: Learning Universal Controllers with Transformerscited by 89
- 2019Learning to Control Self-Assembling Morphologies: A Study of Generalization via Modularitycited by 70
- 2020My Body is a Cage: the Role of Morphology in Graph-Based Incompatible Controlcited by 70
- 2022Evolution Gym: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Evolving Soft Robotscited by 47
- 2017Scalable Co-Optimization of Morphology and Control in Embodied Machinescited by 40
- 2023MAP-Elites with Descriptor-Conditioned Gradients and Archive Distillation into a Single Policycited by 20
7 more
- 2020MAP-Elites enables Powerful Stepping Stones and Diversity for Modular Roboticscited by 11
- 2023The Quality-Diversity Transformer: Generating Behavior-Conditioned Trajectories with Decision Transformerscited by 10
- 2024Investigating Premature Convergence in Co-optimization of Morphology and Control in Evolved Virtual Soft Robotscited by 9
- 2022Evolving Modular Soft Robots without Explicit Inter-Module Communication using Local Self-Attentioncited by 8
- 2023Modular Controllers Facilitate the Co-Optimization of Morphology and Control in Soft Robotscited by 7
- 2022Co-evolving morphology and control of soft robots using a single genomecited by 5
- 2024Understanding fitness landscapes in morpho-evolution via local optima networkscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.