mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Emotion in Reinforcement Learning Agents and Robots: A Survey

arXiv 1705.05172 ↗First posted 15 May 2017cs.LG cs.AI cs.HCcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article provides the first survey of computational models of emotion in reinforcement learning (RL) agents. The survey focuses on agent/robot emotions, and mostly ignores human user emotions. Emotions are recognized as functional in decision-making by influencing motivation and action selection. Therefore, computational emotion models are usually grounded in the agent's decision making architecture, of which RL is an important subclass. Studying emotions in RL-based agents is useful for three research fields. For machine learning (ML) researchers, emotion models may improve learning efficiency. For the interactive ML and human-robot interaction (HRI) community, emotions can communicate state and enhance user investment. Lastly, it allows affective modelling (AM) researchers to investigate their emotion theories in a successful AI agent class. This survey provides background on emotion theory and RL. It systematically addresses 1) from what underlying dimensions (e.g., homeostasis, appraisal) emotions can be derived and how these can be modelled in RL-agents, 2) what types of emotions have been derived from these dimensions, and 3) how these emotions may either influence the learning efficiency of the agent or be useful as social signals. We also systematically compare evaluation criteria, and draw connections to important RL sub-domains like (intrinsic) motivation and model-based RL. In short, this survey provides both a practical overview for engineers wanting to implement emotions in their RL agents, and identifies challenges and directions for future emotion-RL research.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 May 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Levels of explainable artificial intelligence for human-aligned conversational explanationscited by 21
  2. 2022Generative Personas That Behave and Experience Like Humanscited by 7
  3. 2021Go-Blend behavior and affectcited by 6
  4. 2022Play with Emotion: Affect-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  5. 2022Adaptive Rollout Length for Model-Based RL Using Model-Free Deep RLcited by 5
  6. 2021Survey and Perspective on Social Emotions in Roboticscited by 2
  7. 2024Affectively Framework: Towards Human-like Affect-Based Agentscited by 2
  8. 2021Noe: Norms Emergence and Robustness Based on Emotions in Multiagent Systemscited by 1
  9. 2023Life-inspired Interoceptive Artificial Intelligence for Autonomous and Adaptive Agentscited by 1
  10. 2024Intuitions of Compromise: Utilitarianism vs. Contractualismcited by 1
  11. 2026Ailed: A Psyche-Driven Chess Engine with Dynamic Emotional Modulationcited by 1
  12. 2021Emotions as abstract evaluation criteria in biological and artificial intelligencescited by 0
9 more
  1. 2022Incorporating Rivalry in Reinforcement Learning for a Competitive Gamecited by 0
  2. 2024Towards Understanding Human Emotional Fluctuations with Sparse Check-In Datacited by 0
  3. 2025Emotion-Gradient Metacognitive RSI (Part I): Theoretical Foundations and Single-Agent Architecturecited by 0
  4. 2025The Emotion-Memory Link: Do Memorability Annotations Matter for Intelligent Systems?cited by 0
  5. 2025CosmoCore-Evo: Evolutionary Dream-Replay Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Code Generationcited by 0
  6. 2026Emotional regulation improves deep learning-based image classificationcited by 0
  7. 2026A Transdiagnostic Space of Disorder Like Phenotypes in Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 0
  8. 2026Regret Dominates Surprise: Design-Time Requirements Engineering for Agentic-AI Safetycited by 0
  9. 2026Functional Emotion Without Character: Large Language Models, Aristotelian Disposition, and the Limits of Behavioral Alignmentcited by 0