mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A dataset and exploration of models for understanding video data through fill-in-the-blank question-answering

arXiv 1611.07810 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2016cs.CVcited by 41

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While deep convolutional neural networks frequently approach or exceed human-level performance at benchmark tasks involving static images, extending this success to moving images is not straightforward. Having models which can learn to understand video is of interest for many applications, including content recommendation, prediction, summarization, event/object detection and understanding human visual perception, but many domains lack sufficient data to explore and perfect video models. In order to address the need for a simple, quantitative benchmark for developing and understanding video, we present MovieFIB, a fill-in-the-blank question-answering dataset with over 300,000 examples, based on descriptive video annotations for the visually impaired. In addition to presenting statistics and a description of the dataset, we perform a detailed analysis of 5 different models' predictions, and compare these with human performance. We investigate the relative importance of language, static (2D) visual features, and moving (3D) visual features; the effects of increasing dataset size, the number of frames sampled; and of vocabulary size. We illustrate that: this task is not solvable by a language model alone; our model combining 2D and 3D visual information indeed provides the best result; all models perform significantly worse than human-level. We provide human evaluations for responses given by different models and find that accuracy on the MovieFIB evaluation corresponds well with human judgement. We suggest avenues for improving video models, and hope that the proposed dataset can be useful for measuring and encouraging progress in this very interesting field.

Key facts. Cited by 41 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 11; 2022: 14; 2023: 5; 2024: 6; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

41 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021NExT-QA:Next Phase of Question-Answering to Explaining Temporal Actionscited by 735
  2. 2021MERLOT: Multimodal Neural Script Knowledge Modelscited by 311
  3. 2022Zero-Shot Video Question Answering via Frozen Bidirectional Language Modelscited by 229
  4. 2022MERLOT Reserve: Neural Script Knowledge through Vision and Language and Soundcited by 184
  5. 2021AGQA: A Benchmark for Compositional Spatio-Temporal Reasoningcited by 120
  6. 2022Foundations and Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 116
  7. 2021QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehensioncited by 91
  8. 2021SUTD-TrafficQA: A Question Answering Benchmark and an Efficient Network for Video Reasoning over Traffic Eventscited by 84
  9. 2022Video Question Answering: Datasets, Algorithms and Challengescited by 84
  10. 2022Bridging Video-text Retrieval with Multiple Choice Questionscited by 79
  11. 2022LAVENDER: Unifying Video-Language Understanding as Masked Language Modelingcited by 73
  12. 2022HiTeA: Hierarchical Temporal-Aware Video-Language Pre-trainingcited by 72
29 more
  1. 2022From Representation to Reasoning: Towards both Evidence and Commonsense Reasoning for Video Question-Answeringcited by 51
  2. 2021VX2TEXT: End-to-End Learning of Video-Based Text Generation From Multimodal Inputscited by 42
  3. 2022Clover: Towards A Unified Video-Language Alignment and Fusion Modelcited by 41
  4. 2024Enhancing Video-Language Representations with Structural Spatio-Temporal Alignmentcited by 32
  5. 2025A Shortcut-aware Video-QA Benchmark for Physical Understanding via Minimal Video Pairscited by 30
  6. 2021MovieCuts: A New Dataset and Benchmark for Cut Type Recognitioncited by 26
  7. 2023LvBench: A Benchmark for Long-form Video Understanding with Versatile Multi-modal Question Answeringcited by 25
  8. 2024TraveLER: A Modular Multi-LMM Agent Framework for Video Question-Answeringcited by 24
  9. 2022Watching the News: Towards VideoQA Models that can Readcited by 20
  10. 2024DAM: Dynamic Adapter Merging for Continual Video QA Learningcited by 18
  11. 2022PACS: A Dataset for Physical Audiovisual CommonSense Reasoningcited by 17
  12. 2022Video Question Answering with Iterative Video-Text Co-Tokenizationcited by 16
  13. 2023Learning Situation Hyper-Graphs for Video Question Answeringcited by 15
  14. 2023ANetQA: A Large-scale Benchmark for Fine-grained Compositional Reasoning over Untrimmed Videoscited by 15
  15. 2021Video Question Answering with Phrases via Semantic Rolescited by 13
  16. 2024CausalChaos! Dataset for Comprehensive Causal Action Question Answering Over Longer Causal Chains Grounded in Dynamic Visual Scenescited by 13
  17. 2021Recent Advances in Video Question Answering: A Review of Datasets and Methodscited by 12
  18. 2021FIBER: Fill-in-the-Blanks as a Challenging Video Understanding Evaluation Frameworkcited by 12
  19. 2023Temporal Perceiving Video-Language Pre-trainingcited by 12
  20. 2023Localized Symbolic Knowledge Distillation for Visual Commonsense Modelscited by 12
  21. 2024Long Story Short: Story-level Video Understanding from 20K Short Filmscited by 11
  22. 2022WildQA: In-the-Wild Video Question Answeringcited by 9
  23. 2021AssistSR: Task-oriented Video Segment Retrieval for Personal AI Assistantcited by 8
  24. 2024BDIQA: A New Dataset for Video Question Answering to Explore Cognitive Reasoning through Theory of Mindcited by 5
  25. 2022NEWSKVQA: Knowledge-Aware News Video Question Answeringcited by 4
  26. 2025Cin'easte: A Fine-grained Contextual Movie Question Answering Benchmarkcited by 2
  27. 2025ReSpec: Relevance and Specificity Grounded Online Filtering for Learning on Video-Text Data Streamscited by 1
  28. 2025VideoChain: A Transformer-Based Framework for Multi-hop Video Question Generationcited by 0
  29. 2026TempCloze: Can Video-LLMs Identify the Missing Middle?cited by 0