mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Combining policy gradient and Q-learning

arXiv 1611.01626 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2016cs.LG cs.AI math.OCcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Policy gradient is an efficient technique for improving a policy in a reinforcement learning setting. However, vanilla online variants are on-policy only and not able to take advantage of off-policy data. In this paper we describe a new technique that combines policy gradient with off-policy Q-learning, drawing experience from a replay buffer. This is motivated by making a connection between the fixed points of the regularized policy gradient algorithm and the Q-values. This connection allows us to estimate the Q-values from the action preferences of the policy, to which we apply Q-learning updates. We refer to the new technique as 'PGQL', for policy gradient and Q-learning. We also establish an equivalency between action-value fitting techniques and actor-critic algorithms, showing that regularized policy gradient techniques can be interpreted as advantage function learning algorithms. We conclude with some numerical examples that demonstrate improved data efficiency and stability of PGQL. In particular, we tested PGQL on the full suite of Atari games and achieved performance exceeding that of both asynchronous advantage actor-critic (A3C) and Q-learning.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 8; 2022: 2; 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspectivecited by 281
  2. 2021Greedification Operators for Policy Optimization: Investigating Forward and Reverse KL Divergencescited by 41
  3. 2021Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization with Sample Reusecited by 40
  4. 2021A Max-Min Entropy Framework for Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  5. 2021Probabilistic Mixture-of-Experts for Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
  6. 2024Maximum Entropy Reinforcement Learning via Energy-Based Normalizing Flowcited by 26
  7. 2020Average-reward model-free reinforcement learning: a systematic review and literature mappingcited by 22
  8. 2021A Survey on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Audio-Based Applicationscited by 17
  9. 2026MASPO: Unifying Gradient Utilization, Probability Mass, and Signal Reliability for Robust and Sample-Efficient LLM Reasoningcited by 11
  10. 2023Efficient Exploration via Epistemic-Risk-Seeking Policy Optimizationcited by 10
  11. 2023Inverse Decision Modeling: Learning Interpretable Representations of Behaviorcited by 10
  12. 2025Learning Boltzmann Generators via Constrained Mass Transportcited by 9
12 more
  1. 2021Variational Bayesian Optimistic Samplingcited by 7
  2. 2021Adaptively Calibrated Critic Estimates for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  3. 2023On-Policy Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning Without On-Policy Samplingcited by 6
  4. 2021A Bayesian Approach to Reinforcement Learning of Vision-Based Vehicular Controlcited by 3
  5. 2022Extending Open Bandit Pipeline to Simulate Industry Challengescited by 2
  6. 2023Matryoshka Policy Gradient for Entropy-Regularized RL: Convergence and Global Optimalitycited by 2
  7. 2023Distillation Policy Optimizationcited by 1
  8. 2023Soft Decomposed Policy-Critic: Bridging the Gap for Effective Continuous Control with Discrete RLcited by 1
  9. 2026Distribution-Centric Policy Optimization Dominates Exploration-Exploitation Trade-offcited by 1
  10. 2022A Parametric Class of Approximate Gradient Updates for Policy Optimizationcited by 0
  11. 2024Effective Reward Specification in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  12. 2026Learning to Play: Reinforcement Learning and Gamescited by 0