mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptively Calibrated Critic Estimates for Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2111.12673 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate value estimates are important for off-policy reinforcement learning. Algorithms based on temporal difference learning typically are prone to an over- or underestimation bias building up over time. In this paper, we propose a general method called Adaptively Calibrated Critics (ACC) that uses the most recent high variance but unbiased on-policy rollouts to alleviate the bias of the low variance temporal difference targets. We apply ACC to Truncated Quantile Critics, which is an algorithm for continuous control that allows regulation of the bias with a hyperparameter tuned per environment. The resulting algorithm adaptively adjusts the parameter during training rendering hyperparameter search unnecessary and sets a new state of the art on the OpenAI gym continuous control benchmark among all algorithms that do not tune hyperparameters for each environment. ACC further achieves improved results on different tasks from the Meta-World robot benchmark. Additionally, we demonstrate the generality of ACC by applying it to TD3 and showing an improved performance also in this setting.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2021.

Builds on

28 of 46 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  4. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  5. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
  6. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
  7. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
  8. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
  9. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
  10. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  11. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  12. 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 466
16 more
  1. 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
  2. 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 351
  3. 2016Safe and Efficient Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 260
  4. 2016Sample Efficient Actor-Critic with Experience Replaycited by 185
  5. 2018Meta-Gradient Reinforcement Learningcited by 156
  6. 2020Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile Criticscited by 154
  7. 2020Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learningcited by 117
  8. 2019CrossQ: Batch Normalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Greater Sample Efficiency and Simplicitycited by 89
  9. 2018Learning Navigation Behaviors End-to-End with AutoRLcited by 70
  10. 2021On the Importance of Hyperparameter Optimization for Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 59
  11. 2017Interpolated Policy Gradient: Merging On-Policy and Off-Policy Gradient Estimation for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  12. 2019P3O: Policy-on Policy-off Policy Optimizationcited by 37
  13. 2016Combining policy gradient and Q-learningcited by 23
  14. 2020GRAC: Self-Guided and Self-Regularized Actor-Criticcited by 20
  15. 2021Learning Pessimism for Robust and Efficient Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
  16. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning with Weighted Q-Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

5 papers.