On-Policy Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning Without On-Policy Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
On-policy reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are typically characterized as algorithms that perform policy updates using i.i.d. trajectories collected by the agent's current policy. However, after observing only a finite number of trajectories, such on-policy sampling may produce data that fails to match the expected on-policy data distribution. This sampling error leads to high-variance gradient estimates that yield data-inefficient on-policy learning. Recent work in the policy evaluation setting has shown that non-i.i.d., off-policy sampling can produce data with lower sampling error w.r.t. the expected on-policy distribution than on-policy sampling can produce (Zhong et. al, 2022). Motivated by this observation, we introduce an adaptive, off-policy sampling method to reduce sampling error during on-policy policy gradient RL training. Our method, Proximal Robust On-Policy Sampling (PROPS), reduces sampling error by collecting data with a behavior policy that increases the probability of sampling actions that are under-sampled w.r.t. the current policy. We empirically evaluate PROPS on continuous-action MuJoCo benchmark tasks as well as discrete-action tasks and demonstrate that (1) PROPS decreases sampling error throughout training and (2) increases the data efficiency of on-policy policy gradient algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.
Builds on
32 of 48 references.
References · 32
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
- 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 699
- 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 307
20 more
- 2017Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Modelscited by 255
- 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
- 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 226
- 2016Sample Efficient Actor-Critic with Experience Replaycited by 185
- 2017Intrinsic Motivation and Automatic Curricula via Asymmetric Self-Playcited by 139
- 2016Q-Prop: Sample-Efficient Policy Gradient with An Off-Policy Criticcited by 77
- 2021Conservative Data Sharing for Multi-Task Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 64
- 2023Empirical Design in Reinforcement Learningcited by 54
- 2017Interpolated Policy Gradient: Merging On-Policy and Off-Policy Gradient Estimation for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2019Is the Policy Gradient a Gradient?cited by 40
- 2021Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization with Sample Reusecited by 39
- 2019P3O: Policy-on Policy-off Policy Optimizationcited by 37
- 2021Active Offline Policy Selectioncited by 26
- 2016Combining policy gradient and Q-learningcited by 23
- 2018Efficient Counterfactual Learning from Bandit Feedbackcited by 15
- 2021Robust On-Policy Sampling for Data-Efficient Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2022Safe Exploration for Efficient Policy Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 15
- 2022ReVar: Strengthening Policy Evaluation via Reduced Variance Samplingcited by 15
- 2020Reducing Sampling Error in Batch Temporal Difference Learningcited by 11
- 2022Variance-Optimal Augmentation Logging for Counterfactual Evaluation in Contextual Banditscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Improving Data Efficiency for LLM Reinforcement Fine-tuning Through Difficulty-targeted Online Data Selection and Rollout Replaycited by 52
- 2025When Can Model-Free Reinforcement Learning be Enough for Thinking?cited by 5
- 2026SteinGate: Tail-Sensitive Safe Reinforcement Learning via Stein Discrepancycited by 1
- 2025Centralized Adaptive Sampling for Reliable Co-Training of Independent Multi-Agent Policiescited by 0
- 2026Not All Transitions Matter: Evidence from PPOcited by 0
- 2026OPTS-TTPO: Enhancing Finite-Sample Policy-Gradient Learning with Tree Searchcited by 0
- 2026OPTS-TTPO: Enhancing Finite-Sample Policy-Gradient Learning with Tree Search30 Sep 2026
- 2026SteinGate: Tail-Sensitive Safe Reinforcement Learning via Stein Discrepancy14 Jul 2026
- 2026Not All Transitions Matter: Evidence from PPO22 May 2026
- 2025Centralized Adaptive Sampling for Reliable Co-Training of Independent Multi-Agent Policies1 Aug 2025
- 2025When Can Model-Free Reinforcement Learning be Enough for Thinking?20 Jun 2025
- 2025Improving Data Efficiency for LLM Reinforcement Fine-tuning Through Difficulty-targeted Online Data Selection and Rollout Replay5 Jun 2025