Variational Bayesian Optimistic Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider online sequential decision problems where an agent must balance exploration and exploitation. We derive a set of Bayesian `optimistic' policies which, in the stochastic multi-armed bandit case, includes the Thompson sampling policy. We provide a new analysis showing that any algorithm producing policies in the optimistic set enjoys tilde O(√AT) Bayesian regret for a problem with A actions after T rounds. We extend the regret analysis for optimistic policies to bilinear saddle-point problems which include zero-sum matrix games and constrained bandits as special cases. In this case we show that Thompson sampling can produce policies outside of the optimistic set and suffer linear regret in some instances. Finding a policy inside the optimistic set amounts to solving a convex optimization problem and we call the resulting algorithm `variational Bayesian optimistic sampling' (VBOS). The procedure works for any posteriors, ie, it does not require the posterior to have any special properties, such as log-concavity, unimodality, or smoothness. The variational view of the problem has many useful properties, including the ability to tune the exploration-exploitation tradeoff, add regularization, incorporate constraints, and linearly parameterize the policy.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2021.
Builds on
15 of 41 references.
References · 15
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 669
- 2018Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Reviewcited by 482
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 433
- 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
- 2014An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Thompson Samplingcited by 178
- 2016Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?cited by 117
- 2018Variational Bayesian Reinforcement Learning with Regret Boundscited by 31
- 2020Making Sense of Reinforcement Learning and Probabilistic Inferencecited by 30
- 2016Combining policy gradient and Q-learningcited by 24
- 2020Operator splitting for a homogeneous embedding of the linear complementarity problemcited by 21
- 2019Thompson Sampling with Approximate Inferencecited by 15
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023ReLOAD: Reinforcement Learning with Optimistic Ascent-Descent for Last-Iterate Convergence in Constrained MDPscited by 20
- 2023Probabilistic Inference in Reinforcement Learning Done Rightcited by 11
- 2023Efficient Exploration via Epistemic-Risk-Seeking Policy Optimizationcited by 10
- 2025Thompson Sampling via Fine-Tuning of LLMscited by 6
- 2025LITE: Efficiently Estimating Gaussian Probability of Maximalitycited by 3
- 2022Optimal Regret Is Achievable with Bounded Approximate Inference Error: An Enhanced Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound Frameworkcited by 2
- 2026Thompson Sampling for Learning in Zero-Sum Gamescited by 0
- 2026Thompson Sampling for Learning in Zero-Sum Games11 Oct 2026
- 2025Thompson Sampling via Fine-Tuning of LLMs15 Oct 2025
- 2025LITE: Efficiently Estimating Gaussian Probability of Maximality23 Jan 2025
- 2023Probabilistic Inference in Reinforcement Learning Done Right22 Nov 2023
- 2023Efficient Exploration via Epistemic-Risk-Seeking Policy Optimization18 Feb 2023
- 2023ReLOAD: Reinforcement Learning with Optimistic Ascent-Descent for Last-Iterate Convergence in Constrained MDPs2 Feb 2023
- 2022Optimal Regret Is Achievable with Bounded Approximate Inference Error: An Enhanced Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound Framework31 Jan 2022