Linear Bandits beyond Inner Product Spaces, the case of Bandit Optimal Transport
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Linear bandits have long been a central topic in online learning, with applications ranging from recommendation systems to adaptive clinical trials. Their general learnability has been established when the objective is to minimise the inner product between a cost parameter and the decision variable. While this is highly general, this reliance on an inner product structure belies the name of linear bandits, and fails to account for problems such as Optimal Transport. Using the Kantorovich formulation of Optimal Transport as an example, we show that an inner product structure is not necessary to achieve efficient learning in linear bandits. We propose a refinement of the classical OFUL algorithm that operates by embedding the action set into a Hilbertian subspace, where confidence sets can be built via least-squares estimation. Actions are then constrained to this subspace by penalising optimism. The analysis is completed by leveraging convergence results from penalised (entropic) transport to the Kantorovich problem. Up to this approximation term, the resulting algorithm achieves the same trajectorial regret upper bounds as the OFUL algorithm, which we turn into worst-case regret using functional regression techniques. Its regret interpolates between tildemathcal O(√T) and mathcal O(T), depending on the regularity of the cost function, and recovers the parametric rate tildemathcal O(√dT) in finite-dimensional settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2025.
Builds on
26 of 77 references.
References · 26
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 348
- 2017Joint Distribution Optimal Transportation for Domain Adaptationcited by 280
- 2013Finite-Time Analysis of Kernelised Contextual Banditscited by 177
- 2017A unified view of entropy-regularized Markov decision processescited by 174
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
- 2018Improving GANs Using Optimal Transportcited by 122
- 2021Plugin Estimation of Smooth Optimal Transport Mapscited by 67
- 2013Bandits and Experts in Metric Spacescited by 63
- 2020High-Dimensional Sparse Linear Banditscited by 61
- 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 59
- 2018Linear Bandits with Stochastic Delayed Feedbackcited by 55
14 more
- 2021Rates of Estimation of Optimal Transport Maps using Plug-in Estimators via Barycentric Projectionscited by 52
- 2020Bandit optimisation of functions in the Mat'ern kernel RKHScited by 40
- 2021A Survey on Optimal Transport for Machine Learning: Theory and Applicationscited by 35
- 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
- 2021An Efficient Pessimistic-Optimistic Algorithm for Stochastic Linear Bandits with General Constraintscited by 29
- 2020A gradient descent perspective on Sinkhorncited by 24
- 2016Matching while Learningcited by 19
- 2022Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching Marketscited by 16
- 2023Minimum intrinsic dimension scaling for entropic optimal transportcited by 11
- 2022Convergence rate of general entropic optimal transport costscited by 9
- 2020Approximation Theory Based Methods for RKHS Banditscited by 6
- 2022Online Learning to Transport via the Minimal Selection Principlecited by 6
- 2019I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that, Deep Q-learning from forbidden actioncited by 4
- 2021Pure Exploration and Regret Minimization in Matching Banditscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.