mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Graph-Dependent Regret Bounds in Multi-Armed Bandits with Interference

arXiv 2503.07555 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2025cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study multi-armed bandits under network interference, where each unit's reward depends on its own treatment and those of its neighbors in a given graph. This induces an exponentially large action space, making standard approaches computationally impractical. We propose a novel algorithm that uses the local graph structure to minimize regret. We derive a graph-dependent upper bound on cumulative regret that improves over prior work. Additionally, we provide the first lower bounds for bandits with arbitrary network interference, where each bound involves a distinct structural property of the graph. These bounds show that for both dense and sparse graphs, our algorithm is nearly optimal, with matching upper and lower bounds up to logarithmic factors. When the interference graph is unknown, a variant of our algorithm is Pareto optimal: no algorithm can uniformly outperform it across all instances. We complement our theoretical results with numerical experiments, showing that our approach outperforms the baseline methods.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.

Builds on

27 of 58 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016Causal Bandits: Learning Good Interventions via Causal Inferencecited by 100
  2. 2014Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit and Its Extension to Probabilistically Triggered Armscited by 78
  3. 2014Nonstochastic Multi-Armed Bandits with Graph-Structured Feedbackcited by 61
  4. 2020High-Dimensional Sparse Linear Banditscited by 61
  5. 2017Improving Regret Bounds for Combinatorial Semi-Bandits with Probabilistically Triggered Arms and Its Applicationscited by 44
  6. 2013Graph cluster randomization: network exposure to multiple universescited by 42
  7. 2014Design and analysis of experiments in networks: Reducing bias from interferencecited by 41
  8. 2015Combinatorial Cascading Banditscited by 40
  9. 2017Thompson Sampling for the MNL-Banditcited by 35
  10. 2020Statistical Efficiency of Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 30
  11. 2016Multiple-Play Bandits in the Position-Based Modelcited by 27
  12. 2019Causal Inference Under Interference And Network Uncertaintycited by 27
15 more
  1. 2021Multiple Randomization Designs: Estimation and Inference with Interferencecited by 20
  2. 2022Estimating Total Treatment Effect in Randomized Experiments with Unknown Network Structurecited by 18
  3. 2020Tight Lower Bounds for Combinatorial Multi-Armed Banditscited by 15
  4. 2020Randomized Graph Cluster Randomizationcited by 14
  5. 2020Causal Network Motifs: Identifying Heterogeneous Spillover Effects in A/B Testscited by 14
  6. 2021Adversarial Combinatorial Bandits with General Non-linear Reward Functionscited by 14
  7. 2024Multi-Armed Bandits with Interferencecited by 10
  8. 2024Online Experimental Design With Estimation-Regret Trade-off Under Network Interferencecited by 9
  9. 2024Multi-Armed Bandits with Network Interferencecited by 8
  10. 2024Linear Contextual Bandits with Interferencecited by 7
  11. 2021Network Cluster-Robust Inferencecited by 6
  12. 2024Confounded Budgeted Causal Banditscited by 4
  13. 2025Pure Exploration Beyond Reward Feedback: The Role of Post-Action Contextcited by 3
  14. 2023Leveraging heterogeneous spillover in maximizing contextual bandit rewardscited by 2
  15. 2025Learning Exposure Mapping Functions for Inferring Heterogeneous Peer Effectscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.