Learning to target with network interference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper studies adaptive targeting under network interference in a bandit setting, where treatments applied to one individual may affect others through spillover effects. We consider a linear model in a sparse regime, where each individual's outcome can be affected by at most a few others. We first establish a regret lower bound showing that ignoring the network structure and reducing the problem to a standard linear bandit inevitably leads to inefficient learning, particularly in large populations. To understand how structural information can be leveraged, we analyze regimes with varying levels of knowledge of the interference structure: (1) full support knowledge, (2) knowledge of the column support sizes, and (3) no prior knowledge. For each regime, we establish regret lower bounds characterizing the fundamental limits of learning, and develop algorithms that achieve near-optimal regret. Together, our results provide a unified view of how knowledge of the interference structure governs the efficiency of online learning under interference, and offer practical adaptive targeting algorithms in each setting. Numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world data demonstrate the practical benefits of our algorithms.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.
Builds on
21 of 41 references.
References · 21
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
- 2015Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 255
- 2020High-Dimensional Sparse Linear Banditscited by 61
- 2019Doubly-Robust Lasso Banditcited by 49
- 2013Graph cluster randomization: network exposure to multiple universescited by 42
- 2014Design and analysis of experiments in networks: Reducing bias from interferencecited by 42
- 2020Experimental Design in Two-Sided Platforms: An Analysis of Biascited by 39
- 2020Design and Analysis of Switchback Experimentscited by 38
- 2020Dynamic Batch Learning in High-Dimensional Sparse Linear Contextual Banditscited by 28
- 2021Interference, Bias, and Variance in Two-Sided Marketplace Experimentation: Guidance for Platformscited by 22
- 2022Estimating Total Treatment Effect in Randomized Experiments with Unknown Network Structurecited by 18
- 2017Elements of estimation theory for causal effects in the presence of network interferencecited by 12
9 more
- 2019Policy Targeting under Network Interferencecited by 12
- 2021Average Direct and Indirect Causal Effects under Interferencecited by 10
- 2024Multi-Armed Bandits with Interferencecited by 10
- 2024Online Experimental Design With Estimation-Regret Trade-off Under Network Interferencecited by 9
- 2024Linear Contextual Bandits with Interferencecited by 8
- 2025Graph-Dependent Regret Bounds in Multi-Armed Bandits with Interferencecited by 5
- 2025Scalable Policy Maximization Under Network Interferencecited by 3
- 2025Design-Based Bandits Under Network Interference: Trade-Off Between Regret and Statistical Inferencecited by 1
- 2026Causal Inference on Networks under Misspecified Exposure Mappings: A Partial Identification Frameworkcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.