mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bidirectional Preference Synthesis: Learning Prompt-Conditioned Preferences from Boundary Failures

arXiv 2610.04328 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Correction-based offline preference pipelines commonly treat model failures only as rejected responses under the original prompt. This supervision is incomplete for boundary failures: responses that violate the given instruction yet coherently satisfy a nearby intent or constraint setting. We introduce Bidirectional Preference Synthesis (BPS), a data-construction method for standard Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) that makes this missing prompt dependence explicit. For each validated boundary failure, BPS keeps the conventional forward pair under the original prompt and adds a reverse pair under a synthesized achieved prompt, so the same response is rejected where it is wrong and chosen where it is right, without changing the DPO objective, training a reward model, or requiring online sampling. On Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507, BPS preserves original-side pairwise ranking while raising achieved-side ranking accuracy from 6.8% to 62.3% on held-out crossed anchors, with a similar shift under a Kimi-K2.6 cross-teacher probe. A blind human audit supports the intended reverse preference direction, and downstream evaluations show the clearest separation from Forward-DPO in multilingual multi-turn instruction following, with consistent capability-retention patterns on agentic, tool-use, and code checks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following
  2. 2025Clear Preferences Leave Traces: Reference Model-Guided Sampling for Preference Learning
  3. 2025Reverse Preference Optimization for Complex Instruction Following
  4. 2026Instruction Quality Matters: Refining Instructions for Effective Preference Learning
  5. 2025BPO: Revisiting Preference Modeling in Direct Preference Optimization
  6. 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs
  7. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization
  8. 2026Beyond Uniform Forgetting: A Study of Sequential Direct Preference Optimization Across Preference Settings