Uniform Information Density-Based Preference Optimization
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods also fits: Human values and AI feedback alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
To enable large language models to generate outputs that align with human preferences, optimization algorithms based on the comparison between chosen and rejected output pairs have been developed and been proven effective. Some recent endeavors have utilized certain linguistically-derived assumptions about the preference pairs to guide the design of more precise optimization directions. However, human preferences are complex and hard to measure by simplistic criteria, and it is important to incorporate broader and more sophisticated insights about preferred vs. not-preferred language. In this study, we adopt a well-established psycholinguistic theory, Uniform Information Density, to develop a novel preference optimization algorithm, UIDPO. The basic assumption is that humans prefer to produce language in which information is uniformly distributed, because uniformity induces less cognitive processing effort. To implement this idea into the algorithm, we derive a compound metric for information uniformity by combining the global standard deviation and the local second-order difference, and integrate it to the objective of preference optimization. We compare UIDPO with SimPO, a previous state-of-the-art method, obtaining comparable and sometimes better performance on AlpacaEval2, ArenaHard, and MT-Bench. Additional linguistic analysis on complement clauses also shows that UIDPO can better reflect the tendencies of keeping information uniform in natural language than baselines. Our results show that the subtle human preference over the information rate in language is a helpful source for achieving better human alignment for LLMs. The code repository is published here: https://github.com/CLCS-SUSTech/UIDPO.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 24 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.
Builds on
24 of 45 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Constrain Alignment with Sparse Autoencoders12 Nov
- 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization14 Oct
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment1 Dec
Other references · 15
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
- 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 463
- 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 447
- 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 401
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
- 2021Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesiscited by 68
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Intrinsic Mutual Information as a Modulator for Preference Optimization
- 2024SPO: Multi-Dimensional Preference Sequential Alignment With Implicit Reward Modeling
- 2025Differential Information Distribution: A Bayesian Perspective on Direct Preference Optimization
- 2025Offline Preference Optimization via Maximum Marginal Likelihood Estimation
- 2024Data-Centric Human Preference with Rationales for Direct Preference Alignment
- 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2024Optimizing Language Models for Human Preferences is a Causal Inference Problem
- 2026MixDPO: Modeling Preference Strength for Pluralistic Alignment