mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LSC-DPO: Learning-Signal-Controlled Direct Preference Optimization

arXiv 2610.07592 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become a standard reward-model-free approach for aligning language models with preference data. However, as the scaled preference margin grows during training, the logistic DPO loss becomes progressively less sensitive to further changes. We study DPO from a loss-level geometric perspective and identify the sigmoid factor as a learning signal that characterizes the local sensitivity of the objective. Based on this view, we propose Learning-Signal-Controlled Direct Preference Optimization (LSC-DPO), which dynamically regulates the learning signal near a target regime. A log-space analysis establishes conditions for stable tracking of the target learning-signal regime. Experiments on AlpacaEval 2, MT-Bench, and Anthropic-HH show that LSC-DPO consistently improves over DPO and strong preference-optimization baselines. We further find that different coefficient initializations induce distinct transient learning-signal trajectories even when their later signal levels become similar. Based on this observation, we derive a signal-budget compensation rule that adjusts the target learning signal to compensate for these transient differences. The resulting compensation substantially reduces performance variation across coefficient initializations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Towards Analyzing and Understanding the Limitations of DPO: A Theoretical Perspective
  2. 2024Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness
  3. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
  4. 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization
  5. 2025Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model
  6. 2025DPO-Shift: Shifting the Distribution of Direct Preference Optimization
  7. 2026Disentangling Optimization Scale from Preference Scale in DPO
  8. 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization