Data-Topology Compatibility Enables Personalization in Decentralized Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decentralized learning must balance collaboration with personalization across heterogeneous agents. This paper studies when cooperation can support statistically coherent groups of personalized models. We show that data-topology compatibility enables robust orbit-wise personalization: when local objectives and communication topology have (approximately) compatible automorphisms, agents within an orbit share (approximately) equal limiting distributions, while different orbits remain distinct without explicit personalization. This creates a new intermediate regime between global consensus and independent local learning. Under exact data-topology compatibility, as a reference system, we decompose the stochastic learning dynamics into orbit-level and transverse components, derive a necessary and sufficient stability criterion for distributional synchronization, and characterize the orbit-structured stationary law. Modelling an approximate data-topology compatible system as an varepsilon-perturbed reference system, we prove the introduced errors have uniform-in-time and stationary O(varepsilon) bounds in 2-Wasserstein distance. We also prove sufficient conditions for lower stationary average excess risk than both independent local training and the best single shared parameter. Experiments on synthetic data, MNIST, and CIFAR-10 are in full agreement with the theory. The code is available at https://github.com/Veronicaaa1/orbit-personalization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.
Builds on
24 of 47 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
- 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 672
- 2020Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau Envelopescited by 618
- 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 511
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 502
- 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 367
- 2019The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 305
- 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 300
- 2013On the Convergence of Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 159
- 2016Decentralized Collaborative Learning of Personalized Models over Networkscited by 76
12 more
- 2022Topology-aware Generalization of Decentralized SGDcited by 38
- 2020Noise and Fluctuation of Finite Learning Rate Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 37
- 2019Fully Decentralized Joint Learning of Personalized Models and Collaboration Graphscited by 36
- 2022Refined Convergence and Topology Learning for Decentralized SGD with Heterogeneous Datacited by 32
- 2016Graph partitions and cluster synchronization in networks of oscillatorscited by 6
- 2018Learning over Multitask Graphs -- Part II: Performance Analysiscited by 6
- 2014Diffusion LMS over Multitask Networkscited by 5
- 2024FedSPD: A Soft-clustering Approach for Personalized Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 5
- 2025On the Surprising Effectiveness of a Single Global Merging in Decentralized Learningcited by 3
- 2025Decentralized Dynamic Cooperation of Personalized Models for Federated Continual Learningcited by 2
- 2025Unveiling the Power of Multiple Gossip Steps: A Stability-Based Generalization Analysis in Decentralized Trainingcited by 2
- 2026Improved Convergence Analysis of Topology Dependence in Decentralized SGDcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.