mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improved Convergence Analysis of Topology Dependence in Decentralized SGD

arXiv 2606.09154 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decentralized SGD is a fundamental algorithm in decentralized learning, although the influence of an underlying network topology on its convergence behavior is not yet fully understood. Existing convergence analyses have shown that topologies with a small spectral gap significantly deteriorate the convergence rate of Decentralized SGD in both homogeneous and heterogeneous cases. However, many prior papers have reported that indeed the choice of the topology has a significant experimental impact in the heterogeneous case, but has little experimental impact on training behavior in the homogeneous case. In this paper, we present a tighter convergence analysis of Decentralized SGD, offering a more precise understanding of how topologies affect the convergence rate than the prior analysis. Specifically, unlike existing convergence analyses that used only the spectral gap as a property of the topology, our novel analysis shows that all eigenvalues of the mixing matrix affect the convergence rate. Throughout the experiments, we carefully evaluated the convergence behavior of Decentralized SGD and demonstrated that our novel convergence analysis can more accurately describe the effect of topology on the convergence rate.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

45 of 53 references.

References · 45

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  3. 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
  4. 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 361
  5. 2019On the Linear Speedup Analysis of Communication Efficient Momentum SGD for Distributed Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 178
  6. 2017Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 159
  7. 2018Stochastic Gradient Push for Distributed Deep Learningcited by 152
  8. 2020Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?cited by 151
  9. 2017The Power of Interpolation: Understanding the Effectiveness of SGD in Modern Over-parametrized Learningcited by 150
  10. 2016Achieving Geometric Convergence for Distributed Optimization over Time-Varying Graphscited by 149
  11. 2018D2: Decentralized Training over Decentralized Datacited by 140
  12. 2020Stochastic Polyak Step-size for SGD: An Adaptive Learning Rate for Fast Convergencecited by 137
33 more
  1. 2017Network Topology and Communication-Computation Tradeoffs in Decentralized Optimizationcited by 119
  2. 2019Decentralized Deep Learning with Arbitrary Communication Compressioncited by 109
  3. 2016NEXT: In-Network Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 107
  4. 2018Communication Compression for Decentralized Trainingcited by 87
  5. 2021Quasi-Global Momentum: Accelerating Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Datacited by 69
  6. 2022An Improved Analysis of Gradient Tracking for Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 68
  7. 2019MATCHA: Speeding Up Decentralized SGD via Matching Decomposition Samplingcited by 67
  8. 2020Optimal Complexity in Decentralized Trainingcited by 59
  9. 2021Exponential Graph is Provably Efficient for Decentralized Deep Trainingcited by 55
  10. 2022BEER: Fast O(1/T) Rate for Decentralized Nonconvex Optimization with Communication Compressioncited by 41
  11. 2021RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Datacited by 39
  12. 2021Sharp Bounds for Federated Averaging (Local SGD) and Continuous Perspectivecited by 38
  13. 2022On the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Federated Averaging with Heterogeneous Datacited by 36
  14. 2020Decentralized gradient methods: does topology matter?cited by 35
  15. 2014Stochastic Gradient-Push for Strongly Convex Functions on Time-Varying Directed Graphscited by 31
  16. 2022Refined Convergence and Topology Learning for Decentralized SGD with Heterogeneous Datacited by 31
  17. 2022Beyond spectral gap: The role of the topology in decentralized learningcited by 27
  18. 2022Communication-Efficient Topologies for Decentralized Learning with O(1) Consensus Ratecited by 25
  19. 2020Moniqua: Modulo Quantized Communication in Decentralized SGDcited by 24
  20. 2022Revisiting Optimal Convergence Rate for Smooth and Non-convex Stochastic Decentralized Optimizationcited by 22
  21. 2021Acceleration in Distributed Optimization under Similaritycited by 17
  22. 2023Decentralized SGD and Average-direction SAM are Asymptotically Equivalentcited by 15
  23. 2021D-Cliques: Compensating for Data Heterogeneity with Topology in Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 12
  24. 2022Data-heterogeneity-aware Mixing for Decentralized Learningcited by 12
  25. 2024The Limits and Potentials of Local SGD for Distributed Heterogeneous Learning with Intermittent Communicationcited by 12
  26. 2023Asynchronous SGD on Graphs: a Unified Framework for Asynchronous Decentralized and Federated Optimizationcited by 11
  27. 2019Hop: Heterogeneity-Aware Decentralized Trainingcited by 10
  28. 2023Beyond Exponential Graph: Communication-Efficient Topologies for Decentralized Learning via Finite-time Convergencecited by 8
  29. 2016Expander Graph and Communication-Efficient Decentralized Optimizationcited by 7
  30. 2023DSGD-CECA: Decentralized SGD with Communication-Optimal Exact Consensus Algorithmcited by 6
  31. 2024Towards Faster Decentralized Stochastic Optimization with Communication Compressioncited by 4
  32. 2025Scalable Decentralized Learning with Teleportationcited by 3
  33. 2024B-ary Tree Push-Pull Method is Provably Efficient for Distributed Learning on Heterogeneous Datacited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.