mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PPG-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for PPG Foundation Models

arXiv 2610.13435 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Photoplethysmography (PPG) is increasingly recorded by wearable and clinical devices at enormous scale, and a growing number of PPG foundation models (FMs) have been developed to compute reusable representations for various downstream tasks. These models are difficult to compare: different evaluations use different datasets, task definitions, preprocessing, downstream heads, hyperparameter tuning, and baselines. We present PPG-Bench, a unifying open-source benchmark evaluating five public PPG FMs across nine open-access datasets and 26 tasks spanning cardiovascular state estimation, activity, sleep, screening, and identification. We evaluate models under four downstream regimes of increasing adaptability (linear probing, random forests, frozen MLP probes, and end-to-end finetuning), with model-specific hyperparameter optimization and subject-disjoint cross-validation. We also evaluate against three controls: random/constant baseline, a deterministic pulse-rate-variability (PRV) feature set, and a generic time-series FM (MOMENT). Across all 68 task-regime combinations, 35.3% show no meaningful FM advantage over the random/constant baseline, and in 83.8% no PPG-specific FM outperforms both PRV and MOMENT. We also find that added downstream head capacity generally improves performance, but can cause significant degradation if the model is performing at chance/constant level. Current PPG FMs therefore cannot yet claim to provide generalised and transferrable representations of PPG signals, and future evaluation in this field should include checks against simple, non-learned controls. Code for the benchmark and instructions to evaluate more models can be found here - https://github.com/mannas-ai/ppg-bench.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.

Builds on

17 of 40 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  3. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  4. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 699
  5. 2024MOMENT: A Family of Open Time-series Foundation Modelscited by 482
  6. 2023Large-scale Training of Foundation Models for Wearable Biosignalscited by 95
  7. 2020Machine Learning in Python: Main developments and technology trends in data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligencecited by 82
  8. 2024PaPaGei: Open Foundation Models for Optical Physiological Signalscited by 69
  9. 2025Pulse-PPG: An Open-Source Field-Trained PPG Foundation Model for Wearable Applications Across Lab and Field Settingscited by 37
  10. 2025EEG-FM-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for the Systematic Evaluation and Diagnostic Analyses of EEG Foundation Modelscited by 23
  11. 2018Nested cross-validation when selecting classifiers is overzealous for most practical applicationscited by 19
  12. 2024WildPPG: A Real-World PPG Dataset of Long Continuous Recordingscited by 15
5 more
  1. 2025AnyPPG: An ECG-Guided PPG Foundation Model Trained on Over 100,000 Hours of Recordings for Holistic Health Profilingcited by 15
  2. 2026SIGMA-PPG: Statistical-prior Informed Generative Masking Architecture for PPG Foundation Modelcited by 8
  3. 2025Benchmarking ECG FMs: A Reality Check Across Clinical Taskscited by 7
  4. 2025Generalist vs Specialist Time Series Foundation Models: Investigating Potential Emergent Behaviors in Assessing Human Health Using PPG Signalscited by 2
  5. 2026SignalMC-MED: A Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Biosignal Foundation Models on Single-Lead ECG and PPGcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.