MetaOPD: Meta-Learned Token Weighting for On-Policy Distillation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student on its own generated responses using token-level teacher supervision. However, uniform weighting overlooks differences in token learning value, while existing weighting methods rely on predefined mappings from prediction signals to token weights. These mappings are not learned from the effectiveness of the resulting student updates, limiting their ability to adapt to evolving learning needs. In this paper, we propose MetaOPD, a bilevel optimization framework that jointly learns the student model and a lightweight token-weighting network. The inner objective updates the student through weighted OPD, while the outer objective optimizes the weighting network using validation loss on reference solutions after a virtual student update. Differentiating through this update connects weighting decisions to their effects on post-update performance, allowing the mapping from prediction signals to token weights to evolve alongside the student. Experiments on six mathematical reasoning and three out-of-domain datasets, covering two student scales and seven baselines, demonstrate the effectiveness of MetaOPD, with Avg@8/Pass@8 gains over OPD of 1.99/5.97 percentage points for the 0.6B student and 2.25/6.41 points for the 1.7B student.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
22 of 39 references.
References · 22
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2026Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipecited by 262
- 2026Learning beyond Teacher: Generalized On-Policy Distillation with Reward Extrapolationcited by 157
- 2026Entropy-Aware On-Policy Distillation of Language Modelscited by 151
- 2024DistiLLM: Towards Streamlined Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 145
10 more
- 2026TIP: Token Importance in On-Policy Distillationcited by 90
- 2026Scaling Reasoning Efficiently via Relaxed On-Policy Distillationcited by 71
- 2026Not All Disagreement Is Learnable: Token Teachability in On-Policy Distillationcited by 42
- 2026Filter, Then Reweight: Rethinking Optimization Granularity in On-Policy Distillationcited by 31
- 2026When Are Teacher Tokens Reliable? Position-Weighted On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoningcited by 24
- 2026On the Position Bias of On-Policy Distillationcited by 23
- 2026Pass the Baton: Trajectory-Relayed On-Policy Distillationcited by 10
- 2025LLM Data Selection and Utilization via Dynamic Bi-level Optimizationcited by 7
- 2026SPOT: Sparse Probing and Outcome Calibration for On-Policy Distillationcited by 7
- 2026Mismatch Matters: On-Policy Distillation Beyond Token Agreementcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.