LLM Data Selection and Utilization via Dynamic Bi-level Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While large-scale training data is fundamental for developing capable large language models (LLMs), strategically selecting high-quality data has emerged as a critical approach to enhance training efficiency and reduce computational costs. Current data selection methodologies predominantly rely on static, training-agnostic criteria, failing to account for the dynamic model training and data interactions. In this paper, we propose a new Data Weighting Model (DWM) to adjust the weight of selected data within each batch to achieve a dynamic data utilization during LLM training. Specially, to better capture the dynamic data preference of the trained model, a bi-level optimization framework is implemented to update the weighting model. Our experiments demonstrate that DWM enhances the performance of models trained with randomly-selected data, and the learned weighting model can be transferred to enhance other data selection methods and models of different sizes. Moreover, we further analyze how a model's data preferences evolve throughout training, providing new insights into the data preference of the model during training.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2025.
Builds on
21 of 29 references.
References · 21
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
9 more
- 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
- 2020Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learningcited by 216
- 2024RedPajama: an Open Dataset for Training Large Language Modelscited by 182
- 2024RegMix: Data Mixture as Regression for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 177
- 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
- 2024MATES: Model-Aware Data Selection for Efficient Pretraining with Data Influence Modelscited by 100
- 2024Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Modelscited by 84
- 2024Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuningcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2025Winning the Pruning Gamble: A Unified Approach to Joint Sample and Token Pruning for Efficient Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 8
- 2026PruneFuse: Efficient Data Selection via Weight Pruning and Network Fusioncited by 0
- 2026One Algorithm, Two Goals: Dual Scoring for Parameter and Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026D3: Dynamic Directional Graph-Constrained Data Scheduling for LLM Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Unifying Data, Memory, and Compute Efficiency in LLM training: A Surveycited by 0
- 2026Scalable, Transferable Meta-network for Data Selection Requires a Different Loss (and Why the Obvious Choice is Problematic)cited by 0
- 2026MetaOPD: Meta-Learned Token Weighting for On-Policy Distillationcited by 0
- 2026MetaOPD: Meta-Learned Token Weighting for On-Policy Distillation8 Oct 2026
- 2026Scalable, Transferable Meta-network for Data Selection Requires a Different Loss (and Why the Obvious Choice is Problematic)1 Oct 2026
- 2026Unifying Data, Memory, and Compute Efficiency in LLM training: A Survey9 Jun 2026
- 2026D3: Dynamic Directional Graph-Constrained Data Scheduling for LLM Training29 May 2026
- 2026One Algorithm, Two Goals: Dual Scoring for Parameter and Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuning7 May 2026
- 2026PruneFuse: Efficient Data Selection via Weight Pruning and Network Fusion27 Mar 2026
- 2025Winning the Pruning Gamble: A Unified Approach to Joint Sample and Token Pruning for Efficient Supervised Fine-Tuning28 Sep 2025