mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SPOT: Sparse Probing and Outcome Calibration for On-Policy Distillation

arXiv 2608.04419 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

On-policy distillation (OPD) provides dense teacher supervision on student-generated trajectories, but standard reverse-KL training can assign insufficient probability to other plausible continuations. Teacher entropy alone does not reveal whether uncertainty is concentrated among a few plausible next tokens or dispersed over a long probability tail, nor whether the student already represents those candidates well. Moreover, local teacher probabilities may not predict downstream success. We introduce Sparse Probing and Outcome-calibrated Targets OPD (SPOT), which addresses two coupled decisions, where to probe and what to distill, through an acquisition--exploration--exploitation procedure. During acquisition, a position-level score combines normalized teacher entropy, the probability mass captured by a small top-k candidate set, and student--teacher mismatch to allocate a limited probing budget. During exploration, SPOT evaluates teacher-proposed candidates through verifier-scored student continuations. During exploitation, these outcomes produce a closed-form, KL-regularized target that favors candidates with better downstream outcomes while remaining anchored to the teacher distribution. Extensive experiments across multiple student models and reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of SPOT in improving reasoning performance while balancing solution quality and coverage.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.

Builds on

25 of 31 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  4. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  5. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  6. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  7. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  8. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  9. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 779
  10. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  11. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
  12. 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 386
13 more
  1. 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 275
  2. 2026Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipecited by 262
  3. 2026On-Policy Context Distillation for Language Modelscited by 161
  4. 2026Learning beyond Teacher: Generalized On-Policy Distillation with Reward Extrapolationcited by 157
  5. 2026Entropy-Aware On-Policy Distillation of Language Modelscited by 151
  6. 2024DistiLLM: Towards Streamlined Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 145
  7. 2026TIP: Token Importance in On-Policy Distillationcited by 90
  8. 2025DistiLLM-2: A Contrastive Approach Boosts the Distillation of LLMscited by 73
  9. 2025Black-Box On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Modelscited by 53
  10. 2026Uni-OPD: Unifying On-Policy Distillation with a Dual-Perspective Recipecited by 43
  11. 2026Not All Disagreement Is Learnable: Token Teachability in On-Policy Distillationcited by 42
  12. 2025Learning to Focus: Causal Attention Distillation via Gradient-Guided Token Pruningcited by 13
  13. 2026Bridging Reasoning Trajectories in On-Policy Distillation via Near-Future Guidancecited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.