mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HAND: A Biologically-Inspired Activation Function that Improves Generalisation and Sample Efficiency in Image Classification

arXiv 2610.11534 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

DNNs exhibit robustness and generalisation issues not seen in humans. They are also far less data-efficient learners, requiring considerably more training samples to accurately classify novel exemplars. Inductive bias could help with these issues by providing in-built mechanisms to improve generalisation, and hence, reduce reliance on learning from data. We incorporate a biologically-inspired inductive bias into a new activation function, HAND (Homeostasis, Accelerating Nonlinearity, and Divisive-nomalisation), and show its effectiveness with CNNs trained on image classification. Using HAND a ConvNeXt-tiny required 25 training epochs to reach the same accuracy on ImageNet1k as the unmodified model achieved after 200 epochs. Consistent with the effects of an inductive bias, the performance gap reduced with training time and increased data augmentation. When the volume of training data was reduced and unevenly distributed between classes (Long-tailed ImageNet) the improvements in accuracy were even larger and did not reduce with increased training time. Generalisation performance with the common-corruptions data, and the ability to reject samples from unknown classes, were unaffected or improved by HAND. Results generalised across CNN architectures and training data-sets. HAND can, therefore, reduce the required training time and/or the required volume and variety of training data, helping to improve sample efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 117 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

46 of 117 references.

References · 46

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  7. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  8. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  9. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
  10. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  11. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
  12. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
34 more
  1. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  2. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  3. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
  4. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  5. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
  6. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  7. 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 605
  8. 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
  9. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
  10. 2020Balanced Meta-Softmax for Long-Tailed Visual Recognitioncited by 397
  11. 2018How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization?cited by 355
  12. 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 351
  13. 2020Equalization Loss for Long-Tailed Object Recognitioncited by 285
  14. 2022OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 267
  15. 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
  16. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 225
  17. 2019Universal Approximation with Deep Narrow Networkscited by 198
  18. 2017Super-Convergence: Very Fast Training of Neural Networks Using Large Learning Ratescited by 196
  19. 2020The Computational Limits of Deep Learningcited by 188
  20. 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
  21. 2019MNIST-C: A Robustness Benchmark for Computer Visioncited by 137
  22. 2019Enhancing Adversarial Defense by k-Winners-Take-Allcited by 51
  23. 2017Synthesizing Robust Adversarial Examplescited by 39
  24. 2017The iNaturalist Species Classification and Detection Datasetcited by 28
  25. 2022Exploring Optimal Substructure for Out-of-distribution Generalization via Feature-targeted Model Pruningcited by 17
  26. 2023Fantastic Weights and How to Find Them: Where to Prune in Dynamic Sparse Trainingcited by 16
  27. 2022Gradient-Based Adversarial and Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 14
  28. 2023Average of Pruning: Improving Performance and Stability of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 14
  29. 2016Normalizing the Normalizers: Comparing and Extending Network Normalization Schemescited by 12
  30. 2020HYDRA: Pruning Adversarially Robust Neural Networkscited by 10
  31. 2023WDiscOOD: Out-of-Distribution Detection via Whitened Linear Discriminant Analysiscited by 9
  32. 2020Analyzing Redundancy in Pretrained Transformer Modelscited by 6
  33. 2023A Comprehensive Assessment Benchmark for Rigorously Evaluating Deep Learning Image Classifierscited by 1
  34. 2025Improved Robustness from Biologically Inspired Sparse Contrast Representationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.