mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Normalizing the Normalizers: Comparing and Extending Network Normalization Schemes

arXiv 1611.04520 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2016cs.LG stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Normalization techniques have only recently begun to be exploited in supervised learning tasks. Batch normalization exploits mini-batch statistics to normalize the activations. This was shown to speed up training and result in better models. However its success has been very limited when dealing with recurrent neural networks. On the other hand, layer normalization normalizes the activations across all activities within a layer. This was shown to work well in the recurrent setting. In this paper we propose a unified view of normalization techniques, as forms of divisive normalization, which includes layer and batch normalization as special cases. Our second contribution is the finding that a small modification to these normalization schemes, in conjunction with a sparse regularizer on the activations, leads to significant benefits over standard normalization techniques. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our unified divisive normalization framework in the context of convolutional neural nets and recurrent neural networks, showing improvements over baselines in image classification, language modeling as well as super-resolution.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

12 papers.