One-Step Generation via Riemannian Wasserstein Gradient Flows
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, Drifting Models and Wasserstein Gradient Flows have attracted substantial attention because they move iterative distributional refinement to training and amortize it into a generator, enabling fast inference. However, existing formulations have been developed largely for continuous Euclidean domains, such as image spaces, where particles admit unconstrained additive updates. On constrained spaces, these updates can leave the valid domain or ignore its geometry, making them unsuitable targets for training. Recent work has adapted updates to these spaces, but has focused on particular fields or offered limited empirical comparison. We derive and compare several geometry-aware fields within a common training framework for one-step generators. We test the method on data with different structures and obtain competitive one-step results in each setting. The best-performing field varies by task, showing why the choice of objective matters in practice.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.
Builds on
37 of 45 references.
References · 37
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
- 2021Structured Denoising Diffusion Models in Discrete State-Spacescited by 1,719
- 2024Discrete Flow Matchingcited by 317
- 2013One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modelingcited by 308
- 2023Flow Matching on General Geometriescited by 265
- 2020Riemannian Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 145
- 2019Maximum Mean Discrepancy Gradient Flowcited by 127
- 2026Generative Modeling via Driftingcited by 116
25 more
- 2024Dirichlet Flow Matching with Applications to DNA Sequence Designcited by 115
- 2024Fisher Flow Matching for Generative Modeling over Discrete Datacited by 72
- 2026Flow Map Language Models: One-step Language Modeling via Continuous Denoisingcited by 66
- 2024Categorical Flow Matching on Statistical Manifoldscited by 47
- 2026Categorical Flow Mapscited by 44
- 2026Discrete Flow Mapscited by 29
- 2026Sinkhorn-Drifting Generative Modelscited by 24
- 2026One-Step Generative Modeling via Wasserstein Gradient Flowscited by 24
- 2026Generative Drifting is Secretly Score Matching: a Spectral and Variational Perspectivecited by 20
- 2026Gradient Flow Drifting: Generative Modeling via Wasserstein Gradient Flows of KDE-Approximated Divergencescited by 17
- 2025Inverse Bridge Matching Distillationcited by 14
- 2026Drifting Fields are not Conservativecited by 13
- 2025Generalised Flow Maps for Few-Step Generative Modelling on Riemannian Manifoldscited by 12
- 2026A Unified View of Score-Based and Drifting Modelscited by 11
- 2026On the Wasserstein Gradient Flow Interpretation of Drifting Modelscited by 11
- 2025Riemannian Consistency Modelcited by 8
- 2026Riemannian MeanFlowcited by 8
- 2026IDLM: Inverse-distilled Diffusion Language Modelscited by 8
- 2026Kernel-Gradient Drifting Modelscited by 7
- 2025Universal Inverse Distillation for Matching Models with Real-Data Supervision (No GANs)cited by 5
- 2025PairFlow: Closed-Form Source-Target Coupling for Few-Step Generation in Discrete Flow Modelscited by 5
- 2026Riemannian MeanFlow for One-Step Generation on Manifoldscited by 5
- 2025One-Step Residual Shifting Diffusion for Image Super-Resolution via Distillationcited by 3
- 2026Coupling Models for One-Step Discrete Generationcited by 2
- 2026Drifting Objectives for Refining Discrete Diffusion Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.