A Unified View of Score-Based and Drifting Models
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling
Abstract (arXiv)
Drifting models train one-step generators by optimizing a kernel-induced mean-shift discrepancy between the data and model distributions, with Laplace kernels used by default in practice. At each point, this discrepancy compares the kernel-weighted displacement toward nearby data samples with the corresponding displacement toward nearby model samples, thereby defining a transport direction for generated samples. In this paper, we show that drifting is more closely connected to score-based generative modeling than it may first appear, establishing a precise link to the score-matching principle underlying diffusion models. For Gaussian kernels, the population mean-shift field exactly equals the difference between the scores (i.e., the gradient-log-densities) of the Gaussian-smoothed data and model distributions. This identity follows from Tweedie's formula, which links the score of a Gaussian-smoothed density to its conditional mean, and implies that Gaussian-kernel drifting is exactly a score-matching objective on smoothed distributions. More generally, we derive an exact decomposition for radial kernels in which mean shift equals a score-based field plus a residual term. For the practical Laplace kernel, we further show theoretically and empirically that this residual is negligible in high dimension, implying that the transport field used in practice is nearly score-based. Our results reveal a structural connection to diffusion models: both methods use score-mismatch transport directions, but drifting realizes the score nonparametrically through kernel-based estimates, whereas diffusion models learn it parametrically with neural networks.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2026.
Builds on
23 of 32 references.
Closest ancestors · 10
Same direction, newest first
- 2025The Principles of Diffusion Models24 Oct
- 2025Adversarial Distribution Matching for Diffusion Distillation Towards Efficient Image and Video Synthesis24 Jul
- 2023One-step Diffusion with Distribution Matching Distillation30 Nov
- 2023Consistency Trajectory Models: Learning Probability Flow ODE Trajectory of Diffusion1 Oct
- 2023The Score-Difference Flow for Implicit Generative Modeling25 Apr
- 2023Consistency Models2 Mar
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers19 Dec
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance26 Jul
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations26 Nov
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models19 Jun
Other references · 13
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,067
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 703
- 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 524
- 2015Generative Moment Matching Networkscited by 252
- 2017MMD GAN: Towards Deeper Understanding of Moment Matching Networkcited by 251
- 2026Generative Modeling via Driftingcited by 98
- 2017Coulomb GANs: Provably Optimal Nash Equilibria via Potential Fieldscited by 20
- 2025CMT: Mid-Training for Efficient Learning of Consistency, Mean Flow, and Flow Map Modelscited by 18
- 2023Idempotent Generative Networkcited by 17
1 more
- 2026A Long-Short Flow-Map Perspective for Drifting Modelscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026Drifting Fields are not Conservativecited by 11
- 2026Analytical Correction for Subsampling Bias in Drifting Modelscited by 1
- 2026Lookahead Drifting Modelcited by 1
- 2026Drifting Field Policy: A One-Step Generative Policy via Wasserstein Gradient Flowcited by 1
- 2026Unifying Distributional Training for One-Step Visual Generationcited by 1
- 2026Identifiability and Stability of Generative Drifting in the Companion-Elliptic Kernel Familycited by 0
- 2026Generative Modeling with Flux Matchingcited by 0
- 2026Finite-Probe Total-Variation Certificates for Finite-Basis Drifting Modelscited by 0
- 2026Unifying Distributional Training for One-Step Visual Generation28 Sep 2026
- 2026Finite-Probe Total-Variation Certificates for Finite-Basis Drifting Models3 Aug 2026
- 2026Drifting Field Policy: A One-Step Generative Policy via Wasserstein Gradient Flow8 May 2026
- 2026Generative Modeling with Flux Matching8 May 2026
- 2026Analytical Correction for Subsampling Bias in Drifting Models29 Apr 2026
- 2026Identifiability and Stability of Generative Drifting in the Companion-Elliptic Kernel Family27 Apr 2026
- 2026Lookahead Drifting Model10 Apr 2026
- 2026Drifting Fields are not Conservative7 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Kernel-Gradient Drifting Models
- 2023Consistent Diffusion Models: Mitigating Sampling Drift by Learning to be Consistent
- 2022Sampling is as easy as learning the score: theory for diffusion models with minimal data assumptions
- 2026Quantifying Error Propagation and Model Collapse in Diffusion Models
- 2025From Score Matching to Diffusion: A Fine-Grained Error Analysis in the Gaussian Setting
- 2026A Unified Measure-Theoretic View of Diffusion, Score-Based, and Flow Matching Generative Models
- 2025Kernel-Smoothed Scores for Denoising Diffusion: A Bias-Variance Study
- 2023Improved Convergence of Score-Based Diffusion Models via Prediction-Correction