mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Fidelity Policy Gradients Stabilize Data-Scarce Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2610.02505 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity also fits: RL with diffusion and flow models

Abstract (arXiv)

Policy gradient methods for on-policy reinforcement learning (RL) can become unstable when expensive, scarce target-domain data yield noisy gradient estimates. We address this challenge by complementing limited high-fidelity (HF) target-domain data with abundant, cheap, but biased low-fidelity (LF) data, e.g., from a simplified simulator. Most existing methods directly optimize biased objectives based on LF data. In contrast, the recently introduced multi-fidelity policy gradient (MFPG) framework uses LF data solely to construct a control variate that reduces variance and improves HF data efficiency without biasing the policy gradient estimator. However, published work on MFPG is limited to REINFORCE on small-scale simulation tasks. We develop MFPG for modern actor-critic learning in GPU-parallel simulation and on a physical robot. Our analysis and experiments show that naive extensions to proximal policy optimization (PPO) can lose cross-fidelity correlation or inflate variance. Our MFPG-PPO addresses these failures by redesigning the sampling, advantage estimation, and control variate construction to preserve cross-fidelity correlation, and by monitoring estimator uncertainty to prevent variance inflation. We also introduce a budget-aware MFPG-PPO to divide a fixed sampling budget among high- and low-fidelity data sources. Across simulated robot locomotion tasks of varying LF-to-HF transfer difficulty and HF data budgets, MFPG-PPO improves upon PPO trained on HF data alone in nearly all settings, and consistently matches the performance of PPO trained with 16x more HF data on the hardest task at the smallest HF budgets. In contrast, most baselines that use LF data perform well only where direct LF-to-HF transfer succeeds. MFPG-PPO enables stable learning on a physical Franka arm using only 4 real-robot episodes per update and no human demonstrations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 37 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

37 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A Multi-Fidelity Control Variate Approach for Policy Gradient Estimation7 Mar

Other references · 36

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  4. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
  5. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,498
  6. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 786
  7. 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 672
  8. 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 527
  9. 2021Learning to Walk in Minutes Using Massively Parallel Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 512
  10. 2024ManiSkill3: GPU Parallelized Robotics Simulation and Rendering for Generalizable Embodied AIcited by 229
  11. 2025VLA-RL: Towards Masterful and General Robotic Manipulation with Scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 176
  12. 2020Off-Dynamics Reinforcement Learning: Training for Transfer with Domain Classifierscited by 97
24 more
  1. 2019BayesSim: adaptive domain randomization via probabilistic inference for robotics simulatorscited by 85
  2. 2016Q-Prop: Sample-Efficient Policy Gradient with An Off-Policy Criticcited by 81
  3. 2021Legged Robots that Keep on Learning: Fine-Tuning Locomotion Policies in the Real Worldcited by 71
  4. 2022When to Trust Your Simulator: Dynamics-Aware Hybrid Offline-and-Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
  5. 2025RSL-RL: A Learning Library for Robotics Researchcited by 49
  6. 2025Sim-and-Real Co-Training: A Simple Recipe for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 46
  7. 2022DARA: Dynamics-Aware Reward Augmentation in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
  8. 2017Virtual vs. Real: Trading Off Simulations and Physical Experiments in Reinforcement Learning with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 34
  9. 2025PolaRiS: Scalable Real-to-Sim Evaluations for Generalist Robot Policiescited by 33
  10. 2023Cross-Domain Policy Adaptation via Value-Guided Data Filteringcited by 31
  11. 2024Cross-Domain Policy Adaptation by Capturing Representation Mismatchcited by 25
  12. 2023H2O+: An Improved Framework for Hybrid Offline-and-Online RL with Dynamics Gapscited by 17
  13. 2024Off-Dynamics Reinforcement Learning via Domain Adaptation and Reward Augmented Imitationcited by 17
  14. 2019Trajectory-wise Control Variates for Variance Reduction in Policy Gradient Methodscited by 15
  15. 2025Empirical Analysis of Sim-and-Real Cotraining of Diffusion Policies for Planar Pushing from Pixelscited by 13
  16. 2022Multi-fidelity reinforcement learning framework for shape optimizationcited by 9
  17. 2024Policy Learning for Off-Dynamics RL with Deficient Supportcited by 9
  18. 2025MOBODY: Model Based Off-Dynamics Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  19. 2021Sim and Real: Better Togethercited by 7
  20. 2026Simulation Distillation: Pretraining World Models in Simulation for Rapid Real-World Adaptationcited by 6
  21. 2026A Mechanistic Analysis of Sim-and-Real Co-Training in Generative Robot Policiescited by 5
  22. 2024Multi-Fidelity Reinforcement Learning for Time-Optimal Quadrotor Re-planningcited by 4
  23. 2025Staggered Environment Resets Improve Massively Parallel On-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  24. 2025Multi-Fidelity Hybrid Reinforcement Learning via Information Gain Maximizationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Does "Do Differentiable Simulators Give Better Policy Gradients?'' Give Better Policy Gradients?
  2. 2026Test-Time Gradient Guidance of Flow Policies in Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2022Beyond the Policy Gradient Theorem for Efficient Policy Updates in Actor-Critic Algorithms
  4. 2025Group Policy Gradient
  5. 2025Convergence Guarantees of Model-free Policy Gradient Methods for LQR with Stochastic Data
  6. 2024Enhancing Sample Efficiency and Exploration in Reinforcement Learning through the Integration of Diffusion Models and Proximal Policy Optimization
  7. 2025Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices
  8. 2024Deep Policy Gradient Methods Without Batch Updates, Target Networks, or Replay Buffers