Power-SMC: Low-Latency Sequence-Level Power Sampling for Training-Free LLM Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Reasoning ability in large language models is often attributed to distribution sharpening: concentrating output probability on high-likelihood sequences. Recent works show that this sharpening effect can be obtained at inference time, without modifying model parameters, and can elicit strong reasoning performance. A natural formalization is the sequence-level power distribution, which is proportional to the model's probability raised to an exponent α>1. Prior work leveraged Metropolis--Hastings (MH) sampling to draw samples from this distribution and achieves strong results, however, at order-of-magnitude inference slowdowns. We introduce Power-SMC, a textit`training-free' sampling method that targets the same power distribution yielding close to standard decoding latency. Power-SMC maintains multiple candidate sequences in parallel. Each candidate sequence is assigned a score, namely the importance weight, that measures how well it matches the power distribution. It then periodically prunes low-scoring candidate sequences in favor of high-scoring ones. We further provide a theoretical justification for the design choices in Power-SMC. Among all next-token sampling strategies that do not rely on future tokens, we prove that sampling temperature τ=1/α uniquely eliminates per-step weight variance. Finally, we characterize the remaining source of weight instability and introduce a gradual sharpening schedule to reduce weight collapse, while targeting the same power distribution. Extensive evaluations on MATH500, GSM8K, GPQA, and HumanEval show that Power-SMC matches or exceeds MH sampling in accuracy, preserves output diversity unlike RL-finetuned models, while accelerating inference speed by up to 17.6×. The code is available at https://github.com/ArminAzizi98/Power-SMC.
Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.
Builds on
10 of 16 references.
References · 10
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
- 2026Scalable Power Sampling: Unlocking Efficient, Training-Free Reasoning for LLMs via Distribution Sharpeningcited by 27
- 2025Top-H Decoding: Adapting the Creativity and Coherence with Bounded Entropy in Text Generationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 17.
17 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2026Sampling for Quality: Training-Free Reward-Guided LLM Decoding via Sequential Monte Carlocited by 4
- 2026The Model Knows, the Decoder Finds: Future Value Guided Particle Power Samplingcited by 3
- 2026Power Distribution Bridges Sampling, Self-Reward RL, and Self-Distillationcited by 3
- 2026Self-Consistency via Marginal Sharpeningcited by 3
- 2026When are likely answers right? On Sequence Probability and Correctness in LLMscited by 3
- 2026Reasoning with Sampling: Cutting at Decision Pointscited by 2
- 2026More Correct Mass, Worse Answers: Why Power Sampling Can Fail and How to Fix Itcited by 1
- 2026FluxLite: Inference-Time Proposal Control for Discrete Diffusion Modelscited by 1
- 2026Faster LLM Inference via Sequential Monte Carlocited by 0
- 2026COFT: Counterfactual-Conformal Decoding for Fair Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026MOSAIC: Efficient Mixture-of-Agent Scheduling via Adaptive Aggregation and Inference Concurrencycited by 0
- 2026Sample Where You Struggle: Sharpening Base Model Reasoning via Entropy-Guided Power Samplingcited by 0
5 more
- 2026Depth-Entropy Guided Sampling for Training-Free LLM Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Chopthin-Consensus Power Sampling: A Diversity-Preserving Approach to LLM Decodingcited by 0
- 2026ReSight-SMC: Two-Stage Power Sampling via Island SMC with Visual Scoutscited by 0
- 2026Explore Broadly, Reason Sharply: Push Small Models toward the Frontier via Samplingcited by 0
- 2026Finetuning with Sampling: SFT Learns Better Than You Thinkcited by 0
- 2026Finetuning with Sampling: SFT Learns Better Than You Think1 Oct 2026
- 2026Explore Broadly, Reason Sharply: Push Small Models toward the Frontier via Sampling29 Sep 2026
- 2026FluxLite: Inference-Time Proposal Control for Discrete Diffusion Models28 Sep 2026
- 2026ReSight-SMC: Two-Stage Power Sampling via Island SMC with Visual Scouts28 Sep 2026
- 2026Chopthin-Consensus Power Sampling: A Diversity-Preserving Approach to LLM Decoding10 Sep 2026
- 2026More Correct Mass, Worse Answers: Why Power Sampling Can Fail and How to Fix It14 Aug 2026
- 2026When are likely answers right? On Sequence Probability and Correctness in LLMs25 Jun 2026
- 2026Depth-Entropy Guided Sampling for Training-Free LLM Reasoning19 Jun 2026
- 2026Sample Where You Struggle: Sharpening Base Model Reasoning via Entropy-Guided Power Sampling7 Jun 2026
- 2026MOSAIC: Efficient Mixture-of-Agent Scheduling via Adaptive Aggregation and Inference Concurrency2 Jun 2026
- 2026COFT: Counterfactual-Conformal Decoding for Fair Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models28 May 2026
- 2026Reasoning with Sampling: Cutting at Decision Points28 May 2026
5 more
- 2026Self-Consistency via Marginal Sharpening27 May 2026
- 2026Power Distribution Bridges Sampling, Self-Reward RL, and Self-Distillation6 May 2026
- 2026The Model Knows, the Decoder Finds: Future Value Guided Particle Power Sampling4 May 2026
- 2026Faster LLM Inference via Sequential Monte Carlo17 Apr 2026
- 2026Sampling for Quality: Training-Free Reward-Guided LLM Decoding via Sequential Monte Carlo7 Apr 2026
- 2026Power Distribution Bridges Sampling, Self-Reward RL, and Self-Distillationcited by 3
- 2026Self-Consistency via Marginal Sharpeningcited by 3
- 2026Reasoning with Sampling: Cutting at Decision Pointscited by 2
- 2026COFT: Counterfactual-Conformal Decoding for Fair Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Sample Where You Struggle: Sharpening Base Model Reasoning via Entropy-Guided Power Samplingcited by 0
- 2026Depth-Entropy Guided Sampling for Training-Free LLM Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Chopthin-Consensus Power Sampling: A Diversity-Preserving Approach to LLM Decodingcited by 0
- 2026ReSight-SMC: Two-Stage Power Sampling via Island SMC with Visual Scoutscited by 0
- 2026Explore Broadly, Reason Sharply: Push Small Models toward the Frontier via Samplingcited by 0
- 2026Explore Broadly, Reason Sharply: Push Small Models toward the Frontier via Sampling29 Sep 2026
- 2026ReSight-SMC: Two-Stage Power Sampling via Island SMC with Visual Scouts28 Sep 2026
- 2026Chopthin-Consensus Power Sampling: A Diversity-Preserving Approach to LLM Decoding10 Sep 2026
- 2026Depth-Entropy Guided Sampling for Training-Free LLM Reasoning19 Jun 2026
- 2026Sample Where You Struggle: Sharpening Base Model Reasoning via Entropy-Guided Power Sampling7 Jun 2026
- 2026COFT: Counterfactual-Conformal Decoding for Fair Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models28 May 2026
- 2026Reasoning with Sampling: Cutting at Decision Points28 May 2026
- 2026Self-Consistency via Marginal Sharpening27 May 2026
- 2026Power Distribution Bridges Sampling, Self-Reward RL, and Self-Distillation6 May 2026
- 2026Faster LLM Inference via Sequential Monte Carlocited by 0
- 2026Faster LLM Inference via Sequential Monte Carlo17 Apr 2026
- 2026Sampling for Quality: Training-Free Reward-Guided LLM Decoding via Sequential Monte Carlocited by 4
- 2026The Model Knows, the Decoder Finds: Future Value Guided Particle Power Samplingcited by 3
- 2026When are likely answers right? On Sequence Probability and Correctness in LLMscited by 3
- 2026More Correct Mass, Worse Answers: Why Power Sampling Can Fail and How to Fix Itcited by 1
- 2026Finetuning with Sampling: SFT Learns Better Than You Thinkcited by 0
- 2026Finetuning with Sampling: SFT Learns Better Than You Think1 Oct 2026
- 2026More Correct Mass, Worse Answers: Why Power Sampling Can Fail and How to Fix It14 Aug 2026
- 2026When are likely answers right? On Sequence Probability and Correctness in LLMs25 Jun 2026
- 2026The Model Knows, the Decoder Finds: Future Value Guided Particle Power Sampling4 May 2026
- 2026Sampling for Quality: Training-Free Reward-Guided LLM Decoding via Sequential Monte Carlo7 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Adaptive Power Sampling for LLM Reasoning
- 2026Sharpen Without Search: On-Policy Distillation of Sequence-Level Power Distribution
- 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time Intervention
- 2025Sample Smart, Not Hard: Correctness-First Decoding for Better Reasoning in LLMs
- 2026Reject, Resample, Repeat: Understanding Parallel Reasoning in Language Model Inference
- 2026Distributional Energy-Based Models for Uncertainty-Aware Structured LLM Reasoning
- 2025Fast on the Easy, Deep on the Hard: Efficient Reasoning via Powered Length Penalty
- 2025On the Role of Temperature Sampling in Test-Time Scaling