mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Isolated Feature to Orbits: Discovering Music Concepts via Multi-SAE Alignment

arXiv 2610.01864 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.SD cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How can we understand what a music foundation model has learned textitinternally? Most interpretability approaches, such as probing and Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs), focus on identifying individual features with minimal structural assumptions. We argue that many concepts are better understood as textitstructured relations rather than isolated features. This is especially prominent in music, where tonal structures are organized in the space of pitch and time. For example, concepts such as chords or keys are naturally expressed as structured sets (e.g., the 12 transpositions of a chord or the diatonic system within a key), rather than isolated features. In this study, we shift from feature identification to structure-based analysis, asking whether the learned inner representations of music foundation model emerge as organized structures over features. To this end, we introduce a framework that uses pitch transposition as an inductive bias to induce ordered orbits via multi-view SAE alignment. Concretely, we generate pitch-shifted input pairs and align their SAE representations to discover structured groups of pitch-related features. Experimental results show that this approach recovers orbit structures corresponding to chords, keys, and melodic patterns across two state-of-the-art music foundation models, while requiring only minimal grounding (e.g., a few anchor examples) to interpret entire concept families.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

20 of 28 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  2. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  3. 2023Simple and Controllable Music Generationcited by 480
  4. 2025Audio Flamingo 3: Advancing Audio Intelligence with Fully Open Large Audio Language Modelscited by 210
  5. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
  6. 2023MERT: Acoustic Music Understanding Model with Large-Scale Self-supervised Trainingcited by 175
  7. 2019Cutting Music Source Separation Some Slakh: A Dataset to Study the Impact of Training Data Quality and Quantitycited by 86
  8. 2020POP909: A Pop-song Dataset for Music Arrangement Generationcited by 83
  9. 2025MuQ: Self-Supervised Music Representation Learning with Mel Residual Vector Quantizationcited by 66
  10. 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
  11. 2021Codified audio language modeling learns useful representations for music information retrievalcited by 61
  12. 2023A Foundation Model for Music Informaticscited by 45
8 more
  1. 2023MARBLE: Music Audio Representation Benchmark for Universal Evaluationcited by 38
  2. 2025CLaMP 3: Universal Music Information Retrieval Across Unaligned Modalities and Unseen Languagescited by 20
  3. 2024Do Music Generation Models Encode Music Theory?cited by 12
  4. 2025Discovering and Steering Interpretable Concepts in Large Generative Music Modelscited by 11
  5. 2024STONE: Self-supervised Tonality Estimatorcited by 8
  6. 2026AudioSAE: Towards Understanding of Audio-Processing Models with Sparse AutoEncoderscited by 8
  7. 2025S-KEY: Self-supervised Learning of Major and Minor Keys from Audiocited by 4
  8. 2025Universal Music Representations? Evaluating Foundation Models on World Music Corporacited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.