Supervise What Decides Success: Criterion-Aligned Auxiliary Losses for Latent World-Model Planning
On the map: World models → Latent predictive world models also fits: Latent dynamics models and model-based RL
Abstract (arXiv)
Latent world models plan by scoring candidate action sequences with distances in latent space. However, task success is judged by physical quantities, which we call the success-criterion quantities. In all four latent world models we examine, the end-effector position is encoded in the latent state with an error larger than the success criterion allows. Such a latent state cannot separate successful candidates from failing ones. We propose an auxiliary loss that uses success-criterion quantities as training targets, whereas existing latent world models take them only as inputs. During training, a linear head on the encoder and predictor outputs regresses the success-criterion quantities, and the regression error is added to the training loss. The head is discarded after training, so the model, its cost, and its inputs at test time are unchanged. This loss alone improves the success rate on PushT and cube by 3.5% and 3.4% (absolute), respectively, and both improvements are statistically significant. A success criterion thus specifies what a world model must retain in its latent state, and we show that it can serve directly as a training target.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
14 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Is Forward Prediction Enough? Physical State Grounding for JEPA World Models7 Aug
- 2026PhyLatent: Learning Dynamics-Relevant Representations for JEPA World Models6 Aug
- 2026World Model Control by Trajectory Reachability Metrics21 May
- 2026Predictive but Not Plannable: RC-aux for Latent World Models8 May
- 2026LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels13 Mar
Other references · 9
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
- 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 738
- 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
- 2026WorldArena: A Unified Benchmark for Evaluating Perception and Functional Utility of Embodied World Modelscited by 68
- 2018How Many Random Seeds? Statistical Power Analysis in Deep Reinforcement Learning Experimentscited by 56
- 2026RoboWM-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating World Models in Robotic Manipulationcited by 15
- 2026Foresight: Failure Detection for Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation with Action-Conditioned World Model Latentscited by 8
- 2024Representing Positional Information in Generative World Models for Object Manipulationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026When Low Prediction Error Misleads Planning: Diagnosing Representation, Dynamics, and Decision Failures in Latent World Models
- 2026A Control Theory of Predictability in Latent World Models
- 2026Action-Consequence Alignment for Reliable Planning and Self-Improving in Latent World Models
- 2026D-JEPA: A Decision-Aligned Latent World Model
- 2026WorldGuide: Learning Success-Failure Boundaries in Latent World Models for Vision-Language-Action Policies
- 2026Latent State Design for World Models under Sufficiency Constraints
- 2026Decision-Metric Alignment in Latent World Models: Diagnostics and Action-Conditioned Objectives for MPC Planning
- 2026Beyond a single latent space: a dual-latent world model for long-horizon planning