Representing Positional Information in Generative World Models for Object Manipulation
On the map: World models → Embodied and robot world models
Abstract (arXiv)
Object manipulation capabilities are essential skills that set apart embodied agents engaging with the world, especially in the realm of robotics. The ability to predict outcomes of interactions with objects is paramount in this setting. While model-based control methods have started to be employed for tackling manipulation tasks, they have faced challenges in accurately manipulating objects. As we analyze the causes of this limitation, we identify the cause of underperformance in the way current world models represent crucial positional information, especially about the target's goal specification for object positioning tasks. We introduce a general approach that empowers world model-based agents to effectively solve object-positioning tasks. We propose two declinations of this approach for generative world models: position-conditioned (PCP) and latent-conditioned (LCP) policy learning. In particular, LCP employs object-centric latent representations that explicitly capture object positional information for goal specification. This naturally leads to the emergence of multimodal capabilities, enabling the specification of goals through spatial coordinates or a visual goal. Our methods are rigorously evaluated across several manipulation environments, showing favorable performance compared to current model-based control approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and robot world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 24 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2024.
Builds on
24 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2023MoDem-V2: Visuo-Motor World Models for Real-World Robot Manipulation25 Sep
- 2023Multi-View Masked World Models for Visual Robotic Manipulation5 Feb
- 2022Masked World Models for Visual Control28 Jun
- 2021Discovering and Achieving Goals via World Models18 Oct
- 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Hand16 Oct
Other references · 19
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
- 2018World Modelscited by 1,444
- 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
- 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2020Mastering Atari with Discrete World Modelscited by 990
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
- 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
7 more
- 2019Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learningcited by 478
- 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 368
- 2020Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World Modelscited by 365
- 2021Beyond Pick-and-Place: Tackling Robotic Stacking of Diverse Shapescited by 70
- 2021AW-Opt: Learning Robotic Skills with Imitation and Reinforcement at Scalecited by 43
- 2023HarmonyDream: Task Harmonization Inside World Modelscited by 22
- 2022Mastering the Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning Benchmark from Pixelscited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026Latent Particle World Models: Self-supervised Object-centric Stochastic Dynamics Modelingcited by 11
- 2025When Object-Centric World Models Meet Policy Learning: From Pixels to Policies, and Where It Breakscited by 0
- 2026Supervise What Decides Success: Criterion-Aligned Auxiliary Losses for Latent World-Model Planningcited by 0
- 2026Supervise What Decides Success: Criterion-Aligned Auxiliary Losses for Latent World-Model Planning1 Oct 2026
- 2026Latent Particle World Models: Self-supervised Object-centric Stochastic Dynamics Modeling4 Mar 2026
- 2025When Object-Centric World Models Meet Policy Learning: From Pixels to Policies, and Where It Breaks8 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026World Models for Robotic Manipulation: A Survey
- 2025Ctrl-World: A Controllable Generative World Model for Robot Manipulation
- 2026Predicted Futures Are Not Enough: Learning Executable Goals for Robot Manipulation
- 2025A Step Toward World Models: A Survey on Robotic Manipulation
- 2023FOCUS: Object-Centric World Models for Robotics Manipulation
- 2025Object-Centric World Model for Language-Guided Manipulation
- 2026Cortex: A Bidirectionally Aligned Embodied Agent Framework for Long-horizon Manipulation
- 2026Motus2: A Self-Evolving General World Model for Dexterous Manipulation