Detect, Explain, Interpret: An End-to-End Benchmark for Time Series Anomaly Detection, Explainability and Interpretability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Time Series Anomaly Detection has received increasing attention, driven by the growing availability of complex time series data. This surge has led to the development of numerous detection methods, as well as a variety of benchmarks aimed at thoroughly evaluating their performance. However, most existing detectors remain largely agnostic to domain context, overlooking explainability and interpretability. One of the main reasons for this gap is that current benchmarks primarily focus on detection accuracy, and only few of them evaluate spatial explainability. Moreover, no benchmark currently provides sufficiently rich semantic annotations to support the generation of human-understandable interpretations of anomalies. To address these limitations, we introduce SHAD (Scality High-dimensional Anomaly Detection benchmark), a fully annotated benchmark composed of 215 multivariate, high-dimensional time series collected from real-world distributed cloud storage systems operated by Scality. The proposed dataset includes rich contextual information, covering three families of anomalies with varying degrees of severity. As further contribution, we provide a foundation for future work by evaluating baseline methods for Detection, Explainability, and Interpretability, covering all stages of a TSAD pipeline. For Detection, we benchmark a wide range of existing anomaly detectors, testing their effectiveness on the proposed real-world dataset. Then, we consider explainability by evaluating whether measuring the contribution of each dimension in the generated anomaly score can provide accurate anomaly attributions. Finally, for interpretability, we investigate the effectiveness of frozen LLM baselines in localizing and interpreting anomalies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
41 of 100 references.
References · 41
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2022TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysiscited by 1,058
- 2023Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Modelscited by 700
- 2023One Fits All:Power General Time Series Analysis by Pretrained LMcited by 632
- 2023Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasterscited by 500
- 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 410
- 2021Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancycited by 394
- 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 236
- 2023FITS: Modeling Time Series with 10k Parameterscited by 195
- 2020Current Time Series Anomaly Detection Benchmarks are Flawed and are Creating the Illusion of Progresscited by 151
29 more
- 2013A Theoretical Analysis of NDCG Type Ranking Measurescited by 119
- 2023Lag-Llama: Towards Foundation Models for Probabilistic Time Series Forecastingcited by 113
- 2019catch22: CAnonical Time-series CHaracteristicscited by 105
- 2024ChatTS: Aligning Time Series with LLMs via Synthetic Data for Enhanced Understanding and Reasoningcited by 103
- 2024From News to Forecast: Integrating Event Analysis in LLM-Based Time Series Forecasting with Reflectioncited by 98
- 2020Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 97
- 2015Evaluating Real-time Anomaly Detection Algorithms - the Numenta Anomaly Benchmarkcited by 88
- 2023LLMLight: Large Language Models as Traffic Signal Control Agentscited by 73
- 2023RCAgent: Cloud Root Cause Analysis by Autonomous Agents with Tool-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 65
- 2025TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methodscited by 60
- 2020Exathlon: A Benchmark for Explainable Anomaly Detection over Time Seriescited by 56
- 2023ECG-QA: A Comprehensive Question Answering Dataset Combined With Electrocardiogramcited by 54
- 2024Position: What Can Large Language Models Tell Us about Time Series Analysiscited by 47
- 2016Multivariate Industrial Time Series with Cyber-Attack Simulation: Fault Detection Using an LSTM-based Predictive Data Modelcited by 34
- 2023D-Bot: Database Diagnosis System using Large Language Modelscited by 28
- 2020Causality-based Explanation of Classification Outcomescited by 25
- 2022WindowSHAP: An Efficient Framework for Explaining Time-series Classifiers based on Shapley Valuescited by 24
- 2024Dive into Time-Series Anomaly Detection: A Decade Reviewcited by 24
- 2024TimeSeriesBench: An Industrial-Grade Benchmark for Time Series Anomaly Detection Modelscited by 23
- 2024See it, Think it, Sorted: Large Multimodal Models are Few-shot Time Series Anomaly Analyzerscited by 20
- 2022Do Deep Neural Networks Contribute to Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection?cited by 19
- 2016MacroBase: Prioritizing Attention in Fast Datacited by 15
- 2018Robust PCA for Anomaly Detection in Cyber Networkscited by 15
- 2025VUS: Effective and Efficient Accuracy Measures for Time-Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 13
- 2025Stress-Testing Model Specs Reveals Character Differences among Language Modelscited by 13
- 2020Matrix Profile Goes MAD: Variable-Length Motif And Discord Discovery in Data Seriescited by 10
- 2024Text2TimeSeries: Enhancing Financial Forecasting through Time Series Prediction Updates with Event-Driven Insights from Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2020Ensemble Grammar Induction For Detecting Anomalies in Time Seriescited by 5
- 2025Explaining deep learning for ECG using time-localized clusterscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.