mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Q-learning Penalized Transformer for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2609.34426 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Decision transformers and sequence modeling also fits: Safe offline RL

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper addresses the problem of safe offline reinforcement learning, which involves training a policy to satisfy safety constraints using an offline dataset. This problem is inherently challenging as it requires balancing three highly interconnected and competing objectives: satisfying safety constraints, maximizing rewards, and adhering to the behavior regularization imposed by the offline dataset. To tackle this trilogy challenge, we propose Q-learning Penalized Transformer policy (QPT), a training--inference consistent framework that bridges conditional sequence modeling with constraint-aware value estimation. QPT trains a Transformer policy that generates actions conditioned on trajectory context and target return/cost, retaining strong behavior regularization. To inject explicit safety semantics during learning, we augment sequence-model training with a Q-shaped penalty using learned reward and cost Q-functions to favor high return under low constraint violation. At inference, the same Q-functions enforce the cost threshold and choose the highest-reward feasible action, closing the loop between training and deployment. We provide a principled analysis under stylized near-deterministic CMDPs, characterizing how Q-penalized conditional generation improve safety and performance. Empirically, QPT consistently outperforms strong safe offline RL baselines across 38 tasks on the DSRL benchmark, and exhibits robust zero-shot adaptation to different constraint thresholds.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Decision transformers and sequence modeling, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

41 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Q-value Regularized Transformer for Offline Reinforcement Learning27 May
  2. 2022Q-learning Decision Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Programming for Conditional Sequence Modelling in Offline RL8 Sep
  3. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modeling2 Jun
  4. 2021DeepThermal: Combustion Optimization for Thermal Power Generating Units Using Offline Reinforcement Learning23 Feb

Other references · 37

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  4. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  5. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
  6. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
  7. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 882
  8. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
  9. 2022ST-P3: End-to-end Vision-based Autonomous Driving via Spatial-Temporal Feature Learningcited by 365
  10. 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 302
  11. 2021MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learningcited by 281
  12. 2019Batch Policy Learning under Constraintscited by 242
25 more
  1. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic Regularizationcited by 237
  2. 2021OptiDICE: Offline Policy Optimization via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimationcited by 121
  3. 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning in Constrained Markov Decision Processescited by 109
  4. 2021Constraints Penalized Q-learning for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
  5. 2022When Should We Prefer Offline Reinforcement Learning Over Behavioral Cloning?cited by 86
  6. 2023OmniSafe: An Infrastructure for Accelerating Safe Reinforcement Learning Researchcited by 76
  7. 2022When does return-conditioned supervised learning work for offline reinforcement learning?cited by 73
  8. 2022Constrained Variational Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 69
  9. 2022COptiDICE: Offline Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimationcited by 69
  10. 2023Constrained Decision Transformer for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
  11. 2024Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning with Feasibility-Guided Diffusion Modelcited by 62
  12. 2023Datasets and Benchmarks for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
  13. 2023SafeDreamer: Safe Reinforcement Learning with World Modelscited by 50
  14. 2024Learning Multi-Agent Communication from Graph Modeling Perspectivecited by 47
  15. 2021A Primal-Dual Approach to Constrained Markov Decision Processescited by 42
  16. 2022On the Robustness of Safe Reinforcement Learning under Observational Perturbationscited by 38
  17. 2021Learning Barrier Certificates: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with Zero Training-time Violationscited by 36
  18. 2022On Transforming Reinforcement Learning by Transformer: The Development Trajectorycited by 35
  19. 2023Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning with Real-Time Budget Constraintscited by 26
  20. 2024Constraint-Adaptive Policy Switching for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  21. 2024OASIS: Conditional Distribution Shaping for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  22. 2024Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Trajectory Classificationcited by 9
  23. 2024Latent Safety-Constrained Policy Approach for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  24. 2025Analytic Energy-Guided Policy Optimization for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  25. 2025Semi-gradient DICE for Offline Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Weak Data to Strong Policy: Q-Targets Enable Provable In-Context Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2023Q-Transformer: Scalable Offline Reinforcement Learning via Autoregressive Q-Functions
  3. 2024Exclusively Penalized Q-learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2024Q-value Regularized Decision ConvFormer for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2024Q-Distribution guided Q-learning for offline reinforcement learning: Uncertainty penalized Q-value via consistency model
  6. 2023Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuning
  7. 2025Should We Ever Prefer Decision Transformer for Offline Reinforcement Learning?
  8. 2026Safe Flow Q-Learning: Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning with Reachability-Based Flow Policies