Q-value Regularized Decision ConvFormer for Offline Reinforcement Learning
On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Decision transformers and sequence modeling
Abstract (arXiv)
As a data-driven paradigm, offline reinforcement learning (Offline RL) has been formulated as sequence modeling, where the Decision Transformer (DT) has demonstrated exceptional capabilities. Unlike previous reinforcement learning methods that fit value functions or compute policy gradients, DT adjusts the autoregressive model based on the expected returns, past states, and actions, using a causally masked Transformer to output the optimal action. However, due to the inconsistency between the sampled returns within a single trajectory and the optimal returns across multiple trajectories, it is challenging to set an expected return to output the optimal action and stitch together suboptimal trajectories. Decision ConvFormer (DC) is easier to understand in the context of modeling RL trajectories within a Markov Decision Process compared to DT. We propose the Q-value Regularized Decision ConvFormer (QDC), which combines the understanding of RL trajectories by DC and incorporates a term that maximizes action values using dynamic programming methods during training. This ensures that the expected returns of the sampled actions are consistent with the optimal returns. QDC achieves excellent performance on the D4RL benchmark, outperforming or approaching the optimal level in all tested environments. It particularly demonstrates outstanding competitiveness in trajectory stitching capability.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Decision transformers and sequence modeling, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 16 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2024.
Builds on
16 of 18 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Q-value Regularized Transformer for Offline Reinforcement Learning27 May
- 2024Reinformer: Max-Return Sequence Modeling for Offline RL14 May
- 2023Decision ConvFormer: Local Filtering in MetaFormer is Sufficient for Decision Making4 Oct
- 2022Q-learning Decision Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Programming for Conditional Sequence Modelling in Offline RL8 Sep
- 2022You Can't Count on Luck: Why Decision Transformers and RvS Fail in Stochastic Environments31 May
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling Problem3 Jun
- 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modeling2 Jun
Other references · 9
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
- 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
- 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
- 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 882
- 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 654
- 2022When does return-conditioned supervised learning work for offline reinforcement learning?cited by 73
- 2022Offline Q-Learning on Diverse Multi-Task Data Both Scales And Generalizescited by 72
- 2023Elastic Decision Transformercited by 66
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026CNMBI: Determining the Number of Clusters Using Center Pairwise Matching and Boundary Filteringcited by 1
- 2026The Devil Is in Gradient Entanglement: Energy-Aware Gradient Coordinator for Robust Generalized Category Discoverycited by 0
- 2026T2LDM++: A Self-Conditioned Representation Guided Diffusion Model for Realistic Text-to-LiDAR Scene Generationcited by 0
- 2026T2LDM++: A Self-Conditioned Representation Guided Diffusion Model for Realistic Text-to-LiDAR Scene Generation29 Jun 2026
- 2026The Devil Is in Gradient Entanglement: Energy-Aware Gradient Coordinator for Robust Generalized Category Discovery25 Mar 2026
- 2026CNMBI: Determining the Number of Clusters Using Center Pairwise Matching and Boundary Filtering23 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Comparison Between Decision Transformers and Traditional Offline Reinforcement Learning Algorithms
- 2025Should We Ever Prefer Decision Transformer for Offline Reinforcement Learning?
- 2023When should we prefer Decision Transformers for Offline Reinforcement Learning?
- 2022Online Decision Transformer
- 2026Q-learning Penalized Transformer for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning
- 2023Critic-Guided Decision Transformer for Offline Reinforcement Learning
- 2023Q-Transformer: Scalable Offline Reinforcement Learning via Autoregressive Q-Functions
- 2024Reinforcement Learning Gradients as Vitamin for Online Finetuning Decision Transformers