CRF Loss is How Networks Should Learn Boundaries in Weakly Supervised Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation (WSSS) learns pixel-level predictions from image-level tags. Recent work focuses on improving coarse CAMs extracted from large vision-language models (commonly CLIP), but does little to improve their accuracy along segment boundaries. That job is instead delegated to a post-processing method like DenseCRF. However, because DenseCRF relies on low-level colour cues, it can flip correct labels to incorrect ones when neighbouring pixels share similar colours. SAM has recently been adopted as a natural alternative, yet it simply takes on DenseCRF's role as an intermediate "refinement" step that outputs one-hot pseudo-labels in prior work. By discarding the valuable uncertainty in CAMs, these one-hot pseudo-labels turn borderline errors into confidently wrong targets. Our key insight is that CAMs should supervise training alongside SAM boundaries, each through its own loss, rather than being fused together into a single hard target. Inspired by CRF potentials, we propose a framework that disentangles soft pseudo-labels as unary supervision and binary edge maps as pairwise supervision. We realize our framework in a single-stage model, DS-CRF, using CAMs from dino.txt and boundaries from SAM. DS-CRF sets a new state-of-the-art of 56.5% mIoU on MS COCO.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
33 of 54 references.
References · 33
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2018Learning Pixel-level Semantic Affinity with Image-level Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 321
- 2020Self-supervised Equivariant Attention Mechanism for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 300
- 2015Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 214
- 2017Object Region Mining with Adversarial Erasing: A Simple Classification to Semantic Segmentation Approachcited by 201
- 2016Seed, Expand and Constrain: Three Principles for Weakly-Supervised Image Segmentationcited by 198
21 more
- 2018Revisiting Dilated Convolution: A Simple Approach for Weakly- and Semi- Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 145
- 2021Railroad is not a Train: Saliency as Pseudo-pixel Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 127
- 2018On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 121
- 2022CLIP is Also an Efficient Segmenter: A Text-Driven Approach for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 118
- 2018Self-Erasing Network for Integral Object Attentioncited by 95
- 2022Self-supervised Image-specific Prototype Exploration for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 87
- 2024DINOv2 Meets Text: A Unified Framework for Image- and Pixel-Level Vision-Language Alignmentcited by 79
- 2022Cross Language Image Matching for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 72
- 2022L2G: A Simple Local-to-Global Knowledge Transfer Framework for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 57
- 2023Segment Anything Model (SAM) Enhanced Pseudo Labels for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 53
- 2023Foundation Model Assisted Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 33
- 2023An Alternative to WSSS? An Empirical Study of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) on Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Problemscited by 19
- 2023Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Image-Level Labels: from Traditional Models to Foundation Modelscited by 19
- 2024DuPL: Dual Student with Trustworthy Progressive Learning for Robust Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 17
- 2024Hunting Attributes: Context Prototype-Aware Learning for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 16
- 2024Frozen CLIP: A Strong Backbone for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 15
- 2015Deeply Learning the Messages in Message Passing Inferencecited by 8
- 2024Knowledge Transfer with Simulated Inter-Image Erasing for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 8
- 2025Exploring CLIP's Dense Knowledge for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 8
- 2024DIAL: Dense Image-text ALignment for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 4
- 2025Soft Self-labeling and Potts Relaxations for Weakly-Supervised Segmentationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026ModuSeg: Decoupling Object Discovery and Semantic Retrieval for Training-Free Weakly Supervised Segmentation
- 2025Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation via Cross-architecture Consistency Regularization
- 2023Foundation Model Drives Weakly Incremental Learning for Semantic Segmentation
- 2025BoundMatch: Boundary detection applied to semi-supervised segmentation
- 2022SlimSeg: Slimmable Semantic Segmentation with Boundary Supervision
- 2023Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation via Gentle Teaching Assistant
- 2025Diffusion-Guided Knowledge Distillation for Weakly-Supervised Low-Light Semantic Segmentation
- 2022Location-Aware Self-Supervised Transformers for Semantic Segmentation