Soft Self-labeling and Potts Relaxations for Weakly-Supervised Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider weakly supervised segmentation where only a fraction of pixels have ground truth labels (scribbles) and focus on a self-labeling approach optimizing relaxations of the standard unsupervised CRF/Potts loss on unlabeled pixels. While WSSS methods can directly optimize such losses via gradient descent, prior work suggests that higher-order optimization can improve network training by introducing hidden pseudo-labels and powerful CRF sub-problem solvers, e.g. graph cut. However, previously used hard pseudo-labels can not represent class uncertainty or errors, which motivates soft self-labeling. We derive a principled auxiliary loss and systematically evaluate standard and new CRF relaxations (convex and non-convex), neighborhood systems, and terms connecting network predictions with soft pseudo-labels. We also propose a general continuous sub-problem solver. Using only standard architectures, soft self-labeling consistently improves scribble-based training and outperforms significantly more complex specialized WSSS systems. It can outperform full pixel-precise supervision. Our general ideas apply to other weakly-supervised problems/systems.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.
Builds on
24 of 49 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 554
- 2016ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 331
- 2018Learning Pixel-level Semantic Affinity with Image-level Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 321
- 2019Weakly Supervised Learning of Instance Segmentation with Inter-pixel Relationscited by 247
12 more
- 2016Seed, Expand and Constrain: Three Principles for Weakly-Supervised Image Segmentationcited by 198
- 2020Single-Stage Semantic Segmentation from Image Labelscited by 167
- 2019FickleNet: Weakly and Semi-supervised Semantic Image Segmentation using Stochastic Inferencecited by 162
- 2018On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 121
- 2018Normalized Cut Loss for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 112
- 2022Tree Energy Loss: Towards Sparsely Annotated Semantic Segmentationcited by 47
- 2021Universal Weakly Supervised Segmentation by Pixel-to-Segment Contrastive Learningcited by 43
- 2021Scribble-Supervised Semantic Segmentation by Uncertainty Reduction on Neural Representation and Self-Supervision on Neural Eigenspacecited by 19
- 2021Seminar Learning for Click-Level Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 14
- 2024Modeling the Label Distributions for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 7
- 2018Efficient Graph Cut Optimization for Full CRFs with Quantized Edgescited by 1
- 2021Robust Trust Region for Weakly Supervised Segmentationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.