mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Soft Self-labeling and Potts Relaxations for Weakly-Supervised Segmentation

arXiv 2507.01721 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider weakly supervised segmentation where only a fraction of pixels have ground truth labels (scribbles) and focus on a self-labeling approach optimizing relaxations of the standard unsupervised CRF/Potts loss on unlabeled pixels. While WSSS methods can directly optimize such losses via gradient descent, prior work suggests that higher-order optimization can improve network training by introducing hidden pseudo-labels and powerful CRF sub-problem solvers, e.g. graph cut. However, previously used hard pseudo-labels can not represent class uncertainty or errors, which motivates soft self-labeling. We derive a principled auxiliary loss and systematically evaluate standard and new CRF relaxations (convex and non-convex), neighborhood systems, and terms connecting network predictions with soft pseudo-labels. We also propose a general continuous sub-problem solver. Using only standard architectures, soft self-labeling consistently improves scribble-based training and outperforms significantly more complex specialized WSSS systems. It can outperform full pixel-precise supervision. Our general ideas apply to other weakly-supervised problems/systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.

Builds on

24 of 49 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  4. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  5. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
  6. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
  7. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  8. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
  9. 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 554
  10. 2016ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 331
  11. 2018Learning Pixel-level Semantic Affinity with Image-level Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 321
  12. 2019Weakly Supervised Learning of Instance Segmentation with Inter-pixel Relationscited by 247
12 more
  1. 2016Seed, Expand and Constrain: Three Principles for Weakly-Supervised Image Segmentationcited by 198
  2. 2020Single-Stage Semantic Segmentation from Image Labelscited by 167
  3. 2019FickleNet: Weakly and Semi-supervised Semantic Image Segmentation using Stochastic Inferencecited by 162
  4. 2018On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 121
  5. 2018Normalized Cut Loss for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 112
  6. 2022Tree Energy Loss: Towards Sparsely Annotated Semantic Segmentationcited by 47
  7. 2021Universal Weakly Supervised Segmentation by Pixel-to-Segment Contrastive Learningcited by 43
  8. 2021Scribble-Supervised Semantic Segmentation by Uncertainty Reduction on Neural Representation and Self-Supervision on Neural Eigenspacecited by 19
  9. 2021Seminar Learning for Click-Level Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 14
  10. 2024Modeling the Label Distributions for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 7
  11. 2018Efficient Graph Cut Optimization for Full CRFs with Quantized Edgescited by 1
  12. 2021Robust Trust Region for Weakly Supervised Segmentationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.