mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Foundation Model Drives Weakly Incremental Learning for Semantic Segmentation

arXiv 2302.14250 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2023cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern incremental learning for semantic segmentation methods usually learn new categories based on dense annotations. Although achieve promising results, pixel-by-pixel labeling is costly and time-consuming. Weakly incremental learning for semantic segmentation (WILSS) is a novel and attractive task, which aims at learning to segment new classes from cheap and widely available image-level labels. Despite the comparable results, the image-level labels can not provide details to locate each segment, which limits the performance of WILSS. This inspires us to think how to improve and effectively utilize the supervision of new classes given image-level labels while avoiding forgetting old ones. In this work, we propose a novel and data-efficient framework for WILSS, named FMWISS. Specifically, we propose pre-training based co-segmentation to distill the knowledge of complementary foundation models for generating dense pseudo labels. We further optimize the noisy pseudo masks with a teacher-student architecture, where a plug-in teacher is optimized with a proposed dense contrastive loss. Moreover, we introduce memory-based copy-paste augmentation to improve the catastrophic forgetting problem of old classes. Extensive experiments on Pascal VOC and COCO datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our framework, e.g., FMWISS achieves 70.7% and 73.3% in the 15-5 VOC setting, outperforming the state-of-the-art method by 3.4% and 6.1%, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2023.

Builds on

43 of 55 references.

References · 43

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  7. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  8. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  9. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  10. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  11. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  12. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
31 more
  1. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  2. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  3. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  4. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  5. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
  6. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  7. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  8. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
  9. 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,152
  10. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 891
  11. 2016COCO-Stuff: Thing and Stuff Classes in Contextcited by 858
  12. 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 734
  13. 2018End-to-End Incremental Learningcited by 596
  14. 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 552
  15. 2018Learning Pixel-level Semantic Affinity with Image-level Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 321
  16. 2020Self-supervised Equivariant Attention Mechanism for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 299
  17. 2015What's the Point: Semantic Segmentation with Point Supervisioncited by 297
  18. 2018Learning without Memorizingcited by 249
  19. 2016Seed, Expand and Constrain: Three Principles for Weakly-Supervised Image Segmentationcited by 198
  20. 2020Modeling the Background for Incremental Learning in Semantic Segmentationcited by 189
  21. 2019Learning to Remember: A Synaptic Plasticity Driven Framework for Continual Learningcited by 181
  22. 2020PLOP: Learning without Forgetting for Continual Semantic Segmentationcited by 177
  23. 2020Single-Stage Semantic Segmentation from Image Labelscited by 167
  24. 2019FickleNet: Weakly and Semi-supervised Semantic Image Segmentation using Stochastic Inferencecited by 162
  25. 2020Mining Cross-Image Semantics for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 144
  26. 2019Incremental Learning Techniques for Semantic Segmentationcited by 141
  27. 2021Railroad is not a Train: Saliency as Pseudo-pixel Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 127
  28. 2021Continual Semantic Segmentation via Repulsion-Attraction of Sparse and Disentangled Latent Representationscited by 96
  29. 2021RECALL: Replay-based Continual Learning in Semantic Segmentationcited by 83
  30. 2021Incremental Learning in Semantic Segmentation from Image Labelscited by 39
  31. 2020Class-Incremental Learning for Semantic Segmentation Re-Using Neither Old Data Nor Old Labelscited by 31

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

12 papers.