mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vestrum: Improving Agent Harnesses by Adapting Their Verification, Structure and Memory

arXiv 2609.33822 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents also fits: Tool learning and function calling

Abstract (arXiv)

An agent harness controls how a language model accesses information, uses tools, preserves memory, and checks its work. Improving this software is costly when each evaluation requires a long interaction with an environment. We introduce Vestrum, a framework that turns failures in execution traces into scoped harness changes without training the task model. Its organizing overhypothesis is that tasks of a shared kind may exhibit recurring failures whose remedies transfer within that kind. Vestrum expresses failures as recognizable classes, proposes changes across verification, retrieval, decomposition, and knowledge synthesis, and screens their scope before evaluating them as a bundle. A persistent lessons file informs subsequent proposals. Across five settings and two baseline harnesses, the frozen harnesses improve held-out performance: UltraHorizon rises from 47.6 to 59.8 over GAM, Terminal-Bench 4 Hard from 63.7% to 70.3% of checks passed over Claude Code on eight held-out tasks at 1.03x test cost, and cell-type annotation agreement from 67.5% to 77.8% on held-out sections of one slide, alongside gains on LoCoMo and AMA-Bench. Across our searches, verification grounded in evidence helped both intermediate steps and final answers, at lower cost at intermediate steps, while critics asked to rebuild finished answers broke more than they repaired. On the three memory benchmarks, Vestrum also scores above the evaluated GEPA configurations in every paired evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 58 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

Builds on

58 of 65 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026JIT-Agent: Scaling Harness Intelligence via Just-in-Time Harness Evolution26 Aug
  2. 2026From Failed Trajectories to Reliable LLM Agents: Diagnosing and Repairing Harness Flaws4 Jun
  3. 2026Agentic Harness Engineering: Observability-Driven Automatic Evolution of Coding-Agent Harnesses28 Apr
  4. 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures29 Sep
  5. 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems30 Apr
  6. 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generation14 Oct
  7. 2024HyperAgent: Generalist Software Engineering Agents to Solve Coding Tasks at Scale9 Sep

Other references · 51

  1. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  2. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  3. 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
  4. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
  5. 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agentscited by 1,000
  6. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  7. 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 902
  8. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
  9. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 814
  10. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
  11. 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agentscited by 800
  12. 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memorycited by 722
38 more
  1. 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 656
  2. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
  3. 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 449
  4. 2025Zep: A Temporal Knowledge Graph Architecture for Agent Memorycited by 372
  5. 2024Automated Design of Agentic Systemscited by 360
  6. 2025Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Modelscited by 349
  7. 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agentscited by 294
  8. 2024Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programscited by 270
  9. 2024TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Textcited by 250
  10. 2026Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnessescited by 248
  11. 2025Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactionscited by 236
  12. 2024When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMscited by 230
  13. 2025Memory-R1: Enhancing Large Language Model Agents to Manage and Utilize Memories via Reinforcement Learningcited by 220
  14. 2026MemSkill: Learning and Evolving Memory Skills for Self-Evolving Agentscited by 129
  15. 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 102
  16. 2025Recursive Language Modelscited by 94
  17. 2025MemEvolve: Meta-Evolution of Agent Memory Systemscited by 81
  18. 2025Kosmos: An AI Scientist for Autonomous Discoverycited by 78
  19. 2026Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineeringcited by 68
  20. 2015The Ladder: A Reliable Leaderboard for Machine Learning Competitionscited by 67
  21. 2025Mem-α: Learning Memory Construction via Reinforcement Learningcited by 49
  22. 2026AMA-Bench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Memory for Agentic Applicationscited by 46
  23. 2025General Agentic Memory Via Deep Researchcited by 42
  24. 2025UltraHorizon: Benchmarking Agent Capabilities in Ultra Long-Horizon Scenarioscited by 22
  25. 2024Correctness is not Faithfulness in RAG Attributionscited by 18
  26. 2026Locomo-Plus: Beyond-Factual Cognitive Memory Evaluation Framework for LLM Agentscited by 17
  27. 2026Learning to Continually Learn via Meta-learning Agentic Memory Designscited by 16
  28. 2026From Lossy to Verified: A Provenance-Aware Tiered Memory for Agentscited by 16
  29. 2026The Art of Building Verifiers for Computer Use Agentscited by 11
  30. 2026EvolveMem:Self-Evolving Memory Architecture via AutoResearch for LLM Agentscited by 11
  31. 2026Are We Ready For An Agent-Native Memory System?cited by 11
  32. 2026Mnemis: Dual-Route Retrieval on Hierarchical Graphs for Long-Term LLM Memorycited by 7
  33. 2026AutoPyVerifier: Learning Compact Executable Verifiers for Large Language Model Outputscited by 7
  34. 2026On the Generalization Gap in Self-Evolving Language Model Reasoningcited by 4
  35. 2026Fantastic Adaptive Taxonomies and How to Use Themcited by 4
  36. 2026MemPro: Agentic Memory Systems as Evolvable Programscited by 2
  37. 2026AutoMem: A Text-Gradient Recursive Self-Improvement Framework for Automated Memory Architectures Searchcited by 2
  38. 2026How Do Agent Harnesses Create Value? Planning Information and Release Control in Stateful LLM Agentscited by 2

50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Composing Task-specific Agent Harnesses at Test Time with Reusable Primitives
  2. 2026Grow the Harness, Not the Context: From Strategy-Free Scaffolds to Reusable Specialist Agents
  3. 2026Verify Smarter, Evolve Further: Efficient Harness Evolution through Behavior-Aware Verification
  4. 2026Ecdysis: Efficient and Effective Training of Runtime Harnesses for LLM Agents
  5. 2026Harnesses for Inference-Time Alignment over Execution Trajectories
  6. 2026LongHorizon-Harness: Advancing Long-Horizon Agents for Real-World Tasks
  7. 2026MESH-Harness: Self-Improving Agent Harnesses via Bandit-Guided Compositional Evolution
  8. 2026Harness Learning Enables Generalizable Test-Time Adaptation