mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Source Anchoring for Physical Consistency in Flow Matching Models

arXiv 2609.33510 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep generative models are used to solve partial differential equations and model distributions of physical system states, but ensuring that the generated samples satisfy the governing laws remains challenging. Projection-based flow-matching methods enforce physics by correcting the flow from an unconstrained noise distribution. These corrections shift the generated samples away from the distribution of target solutions, especially in high noise regions. To address this limitation, we propose Source Anchoring for Physical Consistency (SAPC), a Functional Flow Matching method that encodes the physical constraints into the source noise before generation begins. We evaluate SAPC on five systems governed by partial differential equations, covering six tasks with linear and non-linear dynamics, and compare results against five baselines and the unconstrained backbone. Anchoring the source reduces the need for large corrections that drive samples onto admissible but off-distribution states, and SAPC reproduces the target distributions most accurately on every evaluated task, while matching the constraint precision of the best projection-based baselines. Ablation experiments show that this gain arises from pairing source projection with a matched training objective that regresses toward the projected source. These results identify the source distribution as a key design choice for physically consistent generative modelling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 32 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

Builds on

32 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Constraint-Aware Flow Matching: Decision Aligned End-to-End Training for Constrained Sampling12 May
  2. 2026Divergence-Free Diffusion Models for Incompressible Fluid Flows27 Jan
  3. 2025Physics vs Distributions: Pareto Optimal Flow Matching with Physics Constraints10 Jun
  4. 2025Physics-Constrained Flow Matching: Sampling Generative Models with Hard Constraints4 Jun
  5. 2024Gradient-Free Generation for Hard-Constrained Systems2 Dec
  6. 2024DiffusionPDE: Generative PDE-Solving Under Partial Observation25 Jun
  7. 2024Physics-Informed Diffusion Models21 Mar
  8. 2024D-Flow: Differentiating through Flows for Controlled Generation21 Feb
  9. 2023Functional Flow Matching26 May
  10. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct

Other references · 22

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  3. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  4. 2022Video Diffusion Modelscited by 2,305
  5. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  6. 2022Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problemscited by 1,416
  7. 2020DiffWave: A Versatile Diffusion Model for Audio Synthesiscited by 1,354
  8. 2022Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Denoising Diffusion Null-Space Modelcited by 583
  9. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
  10. 2023FreeDoM: Training-Free Energy-Guided Conditional Diffusion Modelcited by 294
  11. 2021GRAND: Graph Neural Diffusioncited by 258
  12. 2024Applying Guidance in a Limited Interval Improves Sample and Distribution Quality in Diffusion Modelscited by 254
10 more
  1. 2024Poseidon: Efficient Foundation Models for PDEscited by 200
  2. 2023Artificial Intelligence for Science in Quantum, Atomistic, and Continuum Systemscited by 121
  3. 2024Constrained Synthesis with Projected Diffusion Modelscited by 89
  4. 2023Learning Physical Models that Can Respect Conservation Lawscited by 59
  5. 2024BENO: Boundary-embedded Neural Operators for Elliptic PDEscited by 24
  6. 2025Improving Classifier-Free Guidance in Masked Diffusion: Low-Dim Theoretical Insights with High-Dim Impactcited by 11
  7. 2024Constrained Posterior Sampling: Time Series Generation with Hard Constraintscited by 7
  8. 2026Learning PDE Solvers with Physics and Data: A Unifying View of Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Neural Operatorscited by 6
  9. 2025Enforcing governing equation constraints in neural PDE solvers via training-free projectionscited by 4
  10. 2026Flow Learners for PDEs: Toward a Physics-to-Physics Paradigm for Scientific Computingcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Physics-Constrained Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Models for Generation and Inverse Problems
  2. 2026Physical Fidelity Reconstruction via Improved Consistency-Distilled Flow Matching for Dynamical Systems
  3. 2026Stabilizing Physics-Informed Consistency Models via Structure-Preserving Training
  4. 2025On the flow matching interpretability
  5. 2025Source-Guided Flow Matching
  6. 2024Consistency Flow Matching: Defining Straight Flows with Velocity Consistency
  7. 2026Composing Flow-Matching Energies with Known Physics: Generation, OOD Detection, and Inversion on PDE Fields
  8. 2025Consistency Training with Physical Constraints