mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the flow matching interpretability

arXiv 2510.21210 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2025cs.LG math.ST physics.app-phcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative models based on flow matching have demonstrated remarkable success in various domains, yet they suffer from a fundamental limitation: the lack of interpretability in their intermediate generation steps. In fact these models learn to transform noise into data through a series of vector field updates, however the meaning of each step remains opaque. We address this problem by proposing a general framework constraining each flow step to be sampled from a known physical distribution. Flow trajectories are mapped to (and constrained to traverse) the equilibrium states of the simulated physical process. We implement this approach through the 2D Ising model in such a way that flow steps become thermal equilibrium points along a parametric cooling schedule. Our proposed architecture includes an encoder that maps discrete Ising configurations into a continuous latent space, a flow-matching network that performs temperature-driven diffusion, and a projector that returns to discrete Ising states while preserving physical constraints. We validate this framework across multiple lattice sizes, showing that it preserves physical fidelity while outperforming Monte Carlo generation in speed as the lattice size increases. In contrast with standard flow matching, each vector field represents a meaningful stepwise transition in the 2D Ising model's latent space. This demonstrates that embedding physical semantics into generative flows transforms opaque neural trajectories into interpretable physical processes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 25 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.

Builds on

25 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Physics vs Distributions: Pareto Optimal Flow Matching with Physics Constraints10 Jun
  2. 2024Discrete Flow Matching22 Jul
  3. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
  4. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep

Other references · 21

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  3. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  4. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  5. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  6. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  7. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  8. 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 860
  9. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  10. 2021Diffusion Schr"odinger Bridge with Applications to Score-Based Generative Modelingcited by 602
  11. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
  12. 2020Equivariant Flows: Exact Likelihood Generative Learning for Symmetric Densitiescited by 250
9 more
  1. 2019Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theorycited by 148
  2. 2018Solving Statistical Mechanics Using Variational Autoregressive Networkscited by 100
  3. 2020Sampling using SU(N) gauge equivariant flowscited by 84
  4. 2016Discovering Phase Transitions with Unsupervised Learningcited by 49
  5. 2017Unsupervised learning of phase transitions: from principal component analysis to variational autoencoderscited by 47
  6. 2020Regularized Autoencoders via Relaxed Injective Probability Flowcited by 23
  7. 2021A survey on Variational Autoencoders from a GreenAI perspectivecited by 22
  8. 2020Learning the Ising Model with Generative Neural Networkscited by 9
  9. 2022Image Embedding for Denoising Generative Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Local Flow Matching Generative Models
  2. 2026Source Anchoring for Physical Consistency in Flow Matching Models
  3. 2024Flow Matching with General Discrete Paths: A Kinetic-Optimal Perspective
  4. 2026Physical Fidelity Reconstruction via Improved Consistency-Distilled Flow Matching for Dynamical Systems
  5. 2024Flow map matching with stochastic interpolants: A mathematical framework for consistency models
  6. 2025Physics-Constrained Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Models for Generation and Inverse Problems
  7. 2025Efficient identification of critical regions via Flow Matching-based Monte Carlo initialization
  8. 2025Physics-Constrained Flow Matching: Sampling Generative Models with Hard Constraints