mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cost-free Spectral Estimation for Adaptive Newton--Schulz in Matrix Optimizers

arXiv 2609.33047 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Matrix optimizers such as Muon transform each momentum matrix through an approximate orthogonalization, typically implemented by a small number of Newton-Schulz matrix multiplications. The quality and cost of this approximation depend strongly on the singular-value spectrum of its input, yet existing implementations use the same fixed polynomial routine for every layer and throughout training. We show that this uniform treatment is unnecessary: the computations in the Newton-Schulz method already reveal enough information to make the method adaptive. The Gram matrices formed inside Newton-Schulz iterations yield spectral moments through inexpensive scalar reductions, requiring no additional matrix multiplications. From these moments, we recover an estimate of the empirical singular-value distribution and use it to select a polynomial routine specialized to the current matrix. This turns Newton--Schulz orthogonalization into a spectrum-adaptive procedure that responds to differences across both layers and training time. On saved momentum matrices, spectral estimation substantially reduces orthogonalization error at a fixed iteration budget or reaches the same accuracy with fewer iterations, and in GPT pretraining up to 1B parameters it lowers the validation loss of two matrix optimizers. Our results suggest that matrix-function operations inside optimizers need not be designed for a conservative worst-case spectrum: they can cheaply measure the spectrum they are already processing and specialize computations accordingly.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

Builds on

24 of 43 references.

References · 24

  1. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
  2. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
  3. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
  4. 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
  5. 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 381
  6. 2025The Polar Express: Optimal Matrix Sign Methods and Their Application to the Muon Algorithmcited by 104
  7. 2026Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligencecited by 99
  8. 2025NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 2: An Accurate and Efficient Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Reasoning Modelcited by 94
  9. 2025Practical Efficiency of Muon for Pretrainingcited by 74
  10. 2025Dion: Distributed Orthonormalized Updatescited by 64
  11. 2025AdaMuon: Adaptive Muon Optimizercited by 59
  12. 2025MuonBP: Faster Muon via Block-Periodic Orthogonalizationcited by 34
12 more
  1. 2026Convergence of Muon with Newton-Schulzcited by 30
  2. 2025Beyond the Ideal: Analyzing the Inexact Muon Updatecited by 23
  3. 2021Analysis of stochastic Lanczos quadrature for spectrum approximationcited by 17
  4. 2025ROOT: Robust Orthogonalized Optimizer for Neural Network Trainingcited by 13
  5. 2021Sublinear Time Spectral Density Estimationcited by 9
  6. 2026Delving into Muon and Beyond: Deep Analysis and Extensionscited by 9
  7. 2026Muon with Nesterov Momentum: Heavy-Tailed Noise and (Randomized) Inexact Polar Decompositioncited by 8
  8. 2026PRISM: Distribution-free Adaptive Computation of Matrix Functions for Accelerating Neural Network Trainingcited by 4
  9. 2026CacheMuon: Using Temporal Preconditioning To Approximate Polar Factorcited by 3
  10. 2026Convergence Analysis of Muon-type Methods with Inexact LMO in the Degenerate Casecited by 3
  11. 2026On MUON optimization: From non-convergence to an error analysis with Polar Express and the Newton-Schulz polynomial from implementationscited by 3
  12. 2026Dion3: Full-Stack Orthogonal Updatescited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.