mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BiasReducer: Adaptive Bias Mitigation for Reward Models

arXiv 2609.32720 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF also fits: LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Reward models score responses from large language models (LLMs) and guide LLM training toward human preferences. However, reward models can favor superficial attributes such as length or confidence, leading LLMs to produce higher-scoring but not more correct responses. Existing mitigation methods either retrain the reward model or apply a fixed correction to one known bias, such as a preference for longer responses. Retraining requires additional data and computational resources, while existing editing methods require the target bias to be specified in advance and use a fixed edit for that bias. To this end, we propose BiasReducer, a lightweight framework that edits only the linear reward head and selects the relevant edits for each new dataset. First, BiasReducer uses a sparse autoencoder (SAE)-style encoder to learn which attributes (e.g., length and confidence) the reward model is sensitive to. Second, it learns how to reduce the reward model's dependence on each attribute by determining which direction to adjust the reward head and how much to adjust it. Third, for a new dataset, it ranks the attributes by their influence on reward scores, selects the relevant ones, and edits the reward model accordingly. BiasReducer consistently improves reward-model robustness to biases toward superficial response attributes. Across five reward models, BiasReducer-M improves the three benchmarks by 8.3, 18.0, and 6.9 percentage points on average, outperforming the two training-based baselines. The gains transfer downstream, reducing unnecessary verbosity and sycophancy while maintaining comparable judged quality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 22 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

Builds on

22 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 16

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026HARVE: Hacking-Aware Reward-Head Vector Editing for Robust Reward Models2 Jun
  2. 2026One Bias After Another: Mechanistic Reward Shaping and Persistent Biases in Language Reward Models6 Feb
  3. 2025SparseRM: A Lightweight Preference Modeling with Sparse Autoencoder11 Nov
  4. 2025Interpretable Reward Model via Sparse Autoencoder12 Aug
  5. 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy2 Jul
  6. 2025Robust Reward Modeling via Causal Rubrics19 Jun
  7. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs24 Oct
  8. 2024RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Style21 Oct
  9. 2024RRM: Robust Reward Model Training Mitigates Reward Hacking20 Sep
  10. 2024From Lists to Emojis: How Format Bias Affects Model Alignment18 Sep
  11. 2024Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMs14 Jun
  12. 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithms5 Jun
4 more
  1. 2024ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHF11 Feb
  2. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint18 Dec
  3. 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimization4 Oct
  4. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization19 Oct

Other references · 6

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  4. 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
  5. 2025Flattery, Fluff, and Fog: Diagnosing and Mitigating Idiosyncratic Biases in Preference Modelscited by 13
  6. 2026Toward Robust LLM-Based Judges: Taxonomic Bias Evaluation and Debiasing Optimizationcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Automatically Finding Reward Model Biases
  2. 2026Debiasing Reward Models via Causally Motivated Inference-Time Intervention
  3. 2025Bias Fitting to Mitigate Length Bias of Reward Model in RLHF
  4. 2026SteerRM: Debiasing Reward Models via Sparse Autoencoders
  5. 2025Detecting Prefix Bias in LLM-based Reward Models
  6. 2026Reward Bias Substitution: Single-Axis Bias Mitigations Redirect Optimization Pressure
  7. 2024Reward Difference Optimization For Sample Reweighting In Offline RLHF
  8. 2025Eliminating Inductive Bias in Reward Models with Information-Theoretic Guidance