Reward Difference Optimization For Sample Reweighting In Offline RLHF
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
With the rapid advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), aligning LLMs with human preferences become increasingly important. Although Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) proves effective, it is complicated and highly resource-intensive. As such, offline RLHF has been introduced as an alternative solution, which directly optimizes LLMs with ranking losses on a fixed preference dataset. Current offline RLHF only captures the "ordinal relationship" between responses, overlooking the crucial aspect of how much one is preferred over the others. To address this issue, we propose a simple yet effective solution called Reward Difference Optimization, shorted as RDO. Specifically, we introduce reward difference coefficients to reweigh sample pairs in offline RLHF. We then develop a difference model which captures rich interactions between a pair of responses for predicting these difference coefficients. Experiments with 7B LLMs on the HH and TL;DR datasets substantiate the effectiveness of our method in both automatic metrics and human evaluation, thereby highlighting its potential for aligning LLMs with human intent and values
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2024.
Builds on
23 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modeling17 Aug
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
- 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback17 May
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization19 Oct
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
Other references · 18
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,199
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
- 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimizationcited by 321
6 more
- 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignmentcited by 283
- 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Studycited by 262
- 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Functioncited by 242
- 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedbackcited by 133
- 2023Language Model Alignment with Elastic Resetcited by 34
- 2022What Makes Pre-trained Language Models Better Zero-shot Learners?cited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 35
- 2025Larger or Smaller Reward Margins to Select Preferences for Alignment?cited by 11
- 2025Uni-DPO: A Unified Paradigm for Dynamic Preference Optimization of LLMscited by 9
- 2025RePO: Understanding Preference Learning Through ReLU-Based Optimizationcited by 4
- 2025More Data or Better Data? A Critical Analysis of Data Selection and Synthesis for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 4
- 2025daDPO: Distribution-Aware DPO for Distilling Conversational Abilitiescited by 3
- 2025ReSURE: Regularizing Supervision Unreliability for Multi-turn Dialogue Fine-tuningcited by 3
- 2025Adaptive Margin RLHF via Preference over Preferencescited by 1
- 2026Reverse Constitutional AI: A Framework for Controllable Toxic Data Generation via Probability-Clamped RLAIFcited by 1
- 2026Alignment Tuning for Large Language Models: A Data-Centric Lens on Alignment Data Pipelinescited by 1
- 2026Reverse Constitutional AI: A Framework for Controllable Toxic Data Generation via Probability-Clamped RLAIF20 Apr 2026
- 2026Alignment Tuning for Large Language Models: A Data-Centric Lens on Alignment Data Pipelines7 Apr 2026
- 2025More Data or Better Data? A Critical Analysis of Data Selection and Synthesis for Mathematical Reasoning8 Oct 2025
- 2025Adaptive Margin RLHF via Preference over Preferences26 Sep 2025
- 2025ReSURE: Regularizing Supervision Unreliability for Multi-turn Dialogue Fine-tuning27 Aug 2025
- 2025Uni-DPO: A Unified Paradigm for Dynamic Preference Optimization of LLMs11 Jun 2025
- 2025daDPO: Distribution-Aware DPO for Distilling Conversational Abilities3 Jun 2025
- 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization12 Mar 2025
- 2025RePO: Understanding Preference Learning Through ReLU-Based Optimization10 Mar 2025
- 2025Larger or Smaller Reward Margins to Select Preferences for Alignment?25 Feb 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modeling
- 2024How to Evaluate Reward Models for RLHF
- 2025Provably Efficient Online RLHF with One-Pass Reward Modeling
- 2024Optimal Design for Reward Modeling in RLHF
- 2024Towards Data-Centric RLHF: Simple Metrics for Preference Dataset Comparison
- 2024Towards Understanding the Influence of Reward Margin on Preference Model Performance
- 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint
- 2025Online Preference Alignment for Language Models via Count-based Exploration