CAIRN: Dynamic Fact-Intent DAGs for Multi-Agent Exploration
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM-powered autonomous systems have demonstrated promising capabilities in mathematical reasoning, engineering, and cybersecurity. Yet how to organize these systems for effective, reliable, and sustained performance remains an open question. In this paper, we present CAIRN, a fact-intent-driven multi-agent paradigm for goal-directed exploration. CAIRN represents observations and planned investigations as a dynamic directed acyclic graph (DAG). A reasoner interprets facts to propose intents, which workers execute to produce new facts. Each intent references its supporting facts and defines a potential exploration branch. The persistent graph preserves goals, dependencies and findings across workers, supporting knowledge reuse and parallel exploration. The graph also makes execution trajectories traceable and auditable, providing a basis for human verification and intervention. We evaluate CAIRN across cybersecurity and mathematical reasoning tasks, examining task success, time to solution, and token consumption. DAG-based coordination can incur higher token costs with no observable performance gains on tasks that require little effort. However, on high-effort tasks (at least 1M tokens), we observe faster solutions in 76.5% of cases, with speedups of up to 3.08x. Moreover, as task effort increases, these time gains become more pronounced while relative token overhead declines, highlighting the potential of DAG-guided parallel exploration.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 25 references.
References · 13
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 893
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
- 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 156
- 2024EnIGMA: Interactive Tools Substantially Assist LM Agents in Finding Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 51
- 2026AOrchestra: Automating Sub-Agent Creation for Agentic Orchestrationcited by 30
- 2026MAS-Orchestra: Understanding and Improving Multi-Agent Reasoning Through Holistic Orchestration and Controlled Benchmarkscited by 26
- 2025D-CIPHER: Dynamic Collaborative Intelligent Multi-Agent System with Planner and Heterogeneous Executors for Offensive Securitycited by 19
- 2026AI co-mathematician: Accelerating mathematicians with agentic AIcited by 13
- 2025Verification-Aware Planning for Multi-Agent Systemscited by 9
- 2026How Inference Compute Shapes Frontier LLM Evaluationcited by 5
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Staying on the Attack Path: Structured State for Long-Horizon Automated Penetration Testing
- 2026Argus: A General-Purpose Agentic Reasoning Runtime for Long-Horizon Tasks
- 2026ExComm: Exploration-Stage Communication for Error-Resilient Agentic Test-Time Scaling
- 2025COMPASS: Enhancing Agent Long-Horizon Reasoning with Evolving Context
- 2026AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?
- 2026Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security
- 2025UltraHorizon: Benchmarking Agent Capabilities in Ultra Long-Horizon Scenarios
- 2026When LLMs Team Up: A Coordinated Attack Framework for Automated Cyber Intrusions