mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Argus: A General-Purpose Agentic Reasoning Runtime for Long-Horizon Tasks

arXiv 2608.05144 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Long-horizon reasoning requires an agentic runtime that can persist when evidence supports its current approach and pivot when measurements reveal failure, hidden constraints, or a misspecified objective. We present Argus, a persistent, self-evolving runtime in which Manager, Planner, Engineer, and Reviewer execute bounded missions over durable project state. Argus separates stable user intent from operational objectives, constraints, and verification criteria, and admits memories, skills, procedures, verifiers, routing decisions, and rejected routes only after role-owned review and, when available, task-native verification. Model weights remain fixed; self-evolution occurs through persistent runtime state and control policy, with autonomous execution between operator-owned escalation points. Across seven GPT-5.5 benchmark arenas, Argus achieves about 78% on SWE-Bench Pro versus 59% for Direct Copilot while using 1.41 times the aggregate tokens. After verification-gated self-evolution, mature SWE-Bench waves use 21% fewer solve-input tokens and 15% less active workflow time per task than startup waves, while recording 34 verifier recoveries and 22 strict review-loop rescues. Argus also reaches 76.8% on AARRI-Bench and a 28.0-point gap on mathematical data synthesis, with competitive GPU-kernel and language-model-training results. Beyond benchmarks, an optimized RWKV6 kernel was merged upstream; a multi-day mathematics campaign retained falsified routes and proof-backed frontier updates; and six paper pipelines completed 254 missions with 16 stage rollbacks. These results show that a fixed-weight, self-evolving harness can revise, recover, and accumulate verified approaches while producing structured trajectories for future supervised and reinforcement learning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 38 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.

Builds on

38 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Agent-FLAN: Designing Data and Methods of Effective Agent Tuning for Large Language Models19 Mar
  2. 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents24 Jan
  3. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug

Other references · 35

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  5. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  6. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  7. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
  8. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
  9. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
  10. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
  11. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  12. 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agentscited by 1,063
23 more
  1. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 1,002
  2. 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 867
  3. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
  4. 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistantscited by 425
  5. 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 422
  6. 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 401
  7. 2024Agent Workflow Memorycited by 383
  8. 2025SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?cited by 279
  9. 2025AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Codecited by 226
  10. 2024ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Modelscited by 210
  11. 2024RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human expertscited by 175
  12. 2025Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Taskscited by 156
  13. 2024CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Reviewcited by 148
  14. 2025Agent Lightning: Train ANY AI Agents with Reinforcement Learningcited by 109
  15. 2024SciAgents: Automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoningcited by 94
  16. 2024AgentInstruct: Toward Generative Teaching with Agentic Flowscited by 89
  17. 2025AgentRxiv: Towards Collaborative Autonomous Researchcited by 72
  18. 2026AIRS-Bench: a Suite of Tasks for Frontier AI Research Science Agentscited by 38
  19. 2026Toward Generalist Autonomous Research via Hypothesis-Tree Refinementcited by 22
  20. 2026SOL-ExecBench: Speed-of-Light Benchmarking for Real-World GPU Kernels Against Hardware Limitscited by 18
  21. 2026FARS: A Fully Automated Research System Deployed at Scalecited by 7
  22. 2026AutoSci: A Memory-Centric Agentic System for the Full Scientific Research Lifecyclecited by 5
  23. 2026Act As a Real Researcher: A Suite of Benchmarks Evaluating Frontier LLMs and Agentic Harnesses in Research Lifecyclecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentRewind: Recoverable Execution for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
  2. 2026Reasoning Provenance for Autonomous AI Agents: Structured Behavioral Analytics Beyond State Checkpoints and Execution Traces
  3. 2026Governed Evolution of Agent Runtimes through Executable Operational Cognition
  4. 2026Thinking Before Thinking: Scaling Agentic Inference Through Meta-Reasoning
  5. 2026SWE-Marathon: Can Agents Autonomously Complete Ultra-Long-Horizon Software Work?
  6. 2025UltraHorizon: Benchmarking Agent Capabilities in Ultra Long-Horizon Scenarios
  7. 2026ExComm: Exploration-Stage Communication for Error-Resilient Agentic Test-Time Scaling
  8. 2026EvoAgentBench: Benchmarking Agent Self-Evolution via Ability Transfer