Median Temporal Ensembling: Training-Free Robust Aggregation for Action-Chunked Visuomotor Policies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Action-chunked visuomotor policies predict overlapping trajectories, so every executed action is covered by several predictions. Temporal ensembling smooths execution by combining these predictions with an exponentially weighted mean. One corrupted prediction can move the aggregate without bound: its breakdown point is 0. We use adversarial corruption to stress this deployed aggregator and to compare two kinds of guarantee. A metric guarantee bounds the response to a perturbation of a given size. A combinatorial guarantee instead bounds the damage when at most q of the M candidates covering a timestep are corrupted, whatever their size. Encoder adversarial fine-tuning recovers 44% of the loss under the published patch attack, but only 7.3% after the attacker's step size is increased. By contrast, the coordinate-wise median of the same candidate set keeps its recovered fraction flat as attack optimisation increases. Median temporal ensembling costs one line and requires no retraining. Across 25 (configuration, corruption-level) combinations it is never worse than the mean and is significantly better in 15. It also transfers to a second policy class, and it recovers performance under a failure with no attacker in the loop at all: camera frames that arrive blank. Its effect on clean data is configuration-dependent, from -0.04 to +0.07. We also give the boundary: corruption that shifts every covering prediction by the same amount is invisible to this whole family of statistics, and no equivariant aggregator can remove it.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.
Builds on
29 of 33 references.
References · 29
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
- 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
- 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,427
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2021What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulationcited by 699
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
17 more
- 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
- 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
- 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 324
- 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
- 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 314
- 2021PatchCleanser: Certifiably Robust Defense against Adversarial Patches for Any Image Classifiercited by 63
- 2024Unpacking Failure Modes of Generative Policies: Runtime Monitoring of Consistency and Progresscited by 63
- 2025Model-agnostic Adversarial Attack and Defense for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 19
- 2024Diffusion Policy Attacker: Crafting Adversarial Attacks for Diffusion-based Policiescited by 17
- 2025Falcon: Fast Visuomotor Policies via Partial Denoisingcited by 14
- 2023PatchCURE: Improving Certifiable Robustness, Model Utility, and Computation Efficiency of Adversarial Patch Defensescited by 10
- 2026Rewind-IL: Online Failure Detection and State Respawning for Imitation Learningcited by 7
- 2026Why Does Action Chunking Improve Behavioral Cloning Performance in Robotic Control?cited by 6
- 2025Temporal Action Selection for Action Chunkingcited by 2
- 2025CertMask: Certifiable Defense Against Adversarial Patches via Theoretically Optimal Mask Coveragecited by 2
- 2026VLA-FAIL: Efficient Task Failure Detection for Finetuned Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.