mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DIFTA-3D: Depth-Consistent Instance-Level Feature Transfer and Adaptation of DINOv3 for 3D Detection

arXiv 2609.26702 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

RGB-D 3D instance detectors benefit from visual semantics, but the task-specific Faster R-CNN/ResNet branch used by IIFNet3D couples feature extraction to a separately trained 2D detector and its image-domain labels. Replacing that branch with a frozen vision foundation model removes this task-specific dependency, but may introduce occlusion noise and a mismatch between patch features and geometry-aware detection features. In this work, we investigate this replacement through an adaptation of DINOv3 to the instance-level fusion pipeline of IIFNet3D. At the core of our approach is a depth-consistent feature pipeline that projects scene points into calibrated RGB-D frames, applies a metric depth-residual check, averages the accepted DINOv3 features into an offline point cache, and aggregates the cached features inside proposal-aligned RoI grids. The geometric and bidirectional instance-fusion paths are preserved, while Conservative VAID is evaluated as a low-strength, support-weighted semantic distillation recipe applied only to positive RoIs. We conduct extensive evaluations on ScanNetV2 to assess the proposed transfer recipes. On ScanNetV2, our DINOv3 control achieves mAP scores of 76.15 and 60.93 at IoU thresholds of 0.25 and 0.50, respectively. The Conservative VAID setting achieves mAP scores of 76.59 and 62.16, corresponding to numerical gains of 0.44 and 1.23 points over the control, respectively, in this checkpoint-level recipe comparison. The reported IIFNet3D result of 75.7/63.8 is used only as an external reference because the visual branch and processing protocol differ. Accordingly, we interpret these results as evidence for a controlled transfer recipe rather than as a causal estimate of the individual contributions of VAID or depth filtering.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.

Builds on

21 of 27 references.

References · 21

  1. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  2. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  3. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
  4. 2019Deep Hough Voting for 3D Object Detection in Point Cloudscited by 648
  5. 2022TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformerscited by 464
  6. 2021An End-to-End Transformer Model for 3D Object Detectioncited by 329
  7. 2021Group-Free 3D Object Detection via Transformerscited by 215
  8. 20203D Object Detection with Pointformercited by 194
  9. 2017PointFusion: Deep Sensor Fusion for 3D Bounding Box Estimationcited by 170
  10. 2022Multimodal Token Fusion for Vision Transformerscited by 132
  11. 2020H3DNet: 3D Object Detection Using Hybrid Geometric Primitivescited by 123
  12. 2020ImVoteNet: Boosting 3D Object Detection in Point Clouds with Image Votescited by 119
9 more
  1. 2021FCAF3D: Fully Convolutional Anchor-Free 3D Object Detectioncited by 97
  2. 2020MLCVNet: Multi-Level Context VoteNet for 3D Object Detectioncited by 80
  3. 2020Generative Sparse Detection Networks for 3D Single-shot Object Detectioncited by 69
  4. 2021Back-tracing Representative Points for Voting-based 3D Object Detection in Point Cloudscited by 67
  5. 2022CAGroup3D: Class-Aware Grouping for 3D Object Detection on Point Cloudscited by 58
  6. 2023PiMAE: Point Cloud and Image Interactive Masked Autoencoders for 3D Object Detectioncited by 53
  7. 2024FAST-LIVO2: Fast, Direct LiDAR-Inertial-Visual Odometrycited by 40
  8. 2023TR3D: Towards Real-Time Indoor 3D Object Detectioncited by 32
  9. 2023SPGroup3D: Superpoint Grouping Network for Indoor 3D Object Detectioncited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.