mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Workflow Generation via Adversarial Learning for Audio Deepfake Detection

arXiv 2609.20063 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2026cs.SD cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of speech synthesis and voice conversion technologies has made audio deepfakes increasingly realistic, posing serious security risks in practical applications. While existing detection methods achieve strong performance under controlled conditions, they often fail to generalize under real-world perturbations and corruptions. In this paper, we propose ROGUE, a framework that dynamically constructs robust detection workflows by orchestrating multiple detection tools. ROGUE formulates workflow generation as a sequential decision-making problem and introduces a dual-agent paradigm, where a perturbation agent generates audio perturbations and a policy agent learns to select and execute detection tools under perturbed conditions. Through adversarial learning, ROGUE enables perturbation-aware tool selection, adaptive execution strategies, and improved robustness to distribution shifts. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and real-world corruptions demonstrate that ROGUE consistently outperforms strong baselines in both robustness and generalization. Our results highlight the effectiveness of adversarially optimized workflow generation for building reliable audio deepfake detection systems in real-world deployment settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

Builds on

30 of 35 references.

References · 30

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  4. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  5. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
  6. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 830
  7. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
  8. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
  9. 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generationcited by 395
  10. 2024Automated Design of Agentic Systemscited by 360
  11. 2024TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Textcited by 250
  12. 2021AASIST: Audio Anti-Spoofing using Integrated Spectro-Temporal Graph Attention Networkscited by 173
18 more
  1. 2020End-to-end anti-spoofing with RawNet2cited by 160
  2. 2021ASVspoof 2021: accelerating progress in spoofed and deepfake speech detectioncited by 157
  3. 2022Does Audio Deepfake Detection Generalize?cited by 129
  4. 2023Audiobox: Unified Audio Generation with Natural Language Promptscited by 120
  5. 2021WaveFake: A Data Set to Facilitate Audio Deepfake Detectioncited by 78
  6. 2024AutoFlow: Automated Workflow Generation for Large Language Model Agentscited by 76
  7. 2021RawBoost: A Raw Data Boosting and Augmentation Method applied to Automatic Speaker Verification Anti-Spoofingcited by 64
  8. 2021Investigating self-supervised front ends for speech spoofing countermeasurescited by 43
  9. 2023AI-Synthesized Voice Detection Using Neural Vocoder Artifactscited by 41
  10. 2024The Codecfake Dataset and Countermeasures for the Universally Detection of Deepfake Audiocited by 31
  11. 2024FlashSpeech: Efficient Zero-Shot Speech Synthesiscited by 22
  12. 2024DFADD: The Diffusion and Flow-Matching Based Audio Deepfake Datasetcited by 20
  13. 2025Speech DF Arena: A Leaderboard for Speech DeepFake Detection Modelscited by 20
  14. 2025RobustFlow: Towards Robust Agentic Workflow Generationcited by 19
  15. 2024I Can Hear You: Selective Robust Training for Deepfake Audio Detectioncited by 12
  16. 2024Where are we in audio deepfake detection? A systematic analysis over generative and detection modelscited by 11
  17. 2026Do Compact SSL Backbones Matter for Audio Deepfake Detection? A Controlled Study with RAPTORcited by 4
  18. 2025Measuring the Robustness of Audio Deepfake Detection under Real-World Corruptioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.