Tailoring Domain Adaptation for Machine Translation Quality Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While quality estimation (QE) can play an important role in the translation process, its effectiveness relies on the availability and quality of training data. For QE in particular, high-quality labeled data is often lacking due to the high cost and effort associated with labeling such data. Aside from the data scarcity challenge, QE models should also be generalizable, i.e., they should be able to handle data from different domains, both generic and specific. To alleviate these two main issues -- data scarcity and domain mismatch -- this paper combines domain adaptation and data augmentation within a robust QE system. Our method first trains a generic QE model and then fine-tunes it on a specific domain while retaining generic knowledge. Our results show a significant improvement for all the language pairs investigated, better cross-lingual inference, and a superior performance in zero-shot learning scenarios as compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2023.
Builds on
19 of 42 references.
References · 19
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2020Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuningcited by 238
- 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 211
- 2019Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learningcited by 144
- 2019Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translationcited by 98
- 2018A Survey of Domain Adaptation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 64
- 2020TransQuest: Translation Quality Estimation with Cross-lingual Transformerscited by 59
- 2020MLQE-PE: A Multilingual Quality Estimation and Post-Editing Datasetcited by 47
- 2021Domain Adaptation and Multi-Domain Adaptation for Neural Machine Translation: A Surveycited by 46
7 more
- 2018eSCAPE: a Large-scale Synthetic Corpus for Automatic Post-Editingcited by 18
- 2023Poor Man's Quality Estimation: Predicting Reference-Based MT Metrics Without the Referencecited by 11
- 2019Multilingual Multi-Domain Adaptation Approaches for Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
- 2022Better Quality Estimation for Low Resource Corpus Miningcited by 8
- 2021Selecting Parallel In-domain Sentences for Neural Machine Translation Using Monolingual Textscited by 4
- 2022Original or Translated? On the Use of Parallel Data for Translation Quality Estimationcited by 2
- 2021A New Tool for Efficiently Generating Quality Estimation Datasetscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Fine-Tuned Machine Translation Metrics Struggle in Unseen Domainscited by 21
- 2026Looking under the Wrong Lamppost: On the Limitations of Automated Translation Quality Estimationcited by 1
- 2024Guiding In-Context Learning of LLMs through Quality Estimation for Machine Translationcited by 0
- 2026LocQE: Principled Domain Adaptation for Localisation Quality Estimation by Leveraging Post-Editscited by 0
- 2026LocQE: Principled Domain Adaptation for Localisation Quality Estimation by Leveraging Post-Edits16 Sep 2026
- 2026Looking under the Wrong Lamppost: On the Limitations of Automated Translation Quality Estimation4 Aug 2026
- 2024Guiding In-Context Learning of LLMs through Quality Estimation for Machine Translation12 Jun 2024
- 2024Fine-Tuned Machine Translation Metrics Struggle in Unseen Domains28 Feb 2024